This report on Excite News opens up some interesting questions about the biological link between fathers and their offspring. According to the article, fathers who smoke pot create a greater risk of SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome) for their offspring than mothers. Not much more is known about this phenomenon right now, but it does further the scientific fact that a child is half his father and half his mother (with respect to genetic make-up)... not all his mother and only fertilized by father.

Ned Holstein sent out another update on the public hearings in Massachusetts for reviewing the state's Child Support Guidelines. With one hearing left tomorrow, in Springfield, we need to finish this off on the right foot. Be there if you can! Click Read More below for his announcement.

An editorial in the Olympian newspaper makes some well-needed points that we are doing a great disservice to society and young men by not taking seriously situations where boys are statutorially raped. Too many people, including judges and the media, accept a double standard when an older woman seduces an underage boy, but the consequences are very real. "The media has even romanticized idea of the young man or teen-age boy being guided through sexual encounters by an experienced, mature woman -- as if it were a rite of passage for him. Does anyone stop to consider what this does to the development of these boys as sexual beings as they enter adulthood?" Bravo to Mr. Davis for writing this opinion piece.

frank h sent in this article from TownHall.com and writes "This is a call to action for anyone who thinks that men and women are not equal in combat to contact their Congressmen and tell them so. Thanks to Mona Charen for writing this." The article points out that "Recently, the Center for Strategic and International Studies did a study on the military culture. It found that two-thirds of junior enlisted men did not believe women would pull their own weight if it came to combat. Forty-four percent of junior enlisted women agreed!" Obviously, things aren't right here, something which both genders seem to agree on.

AngryHarry sent in this link from FrontPage Magazine, about an Ohio man who was recently sentenced to seven years in prison for privately writing disturbing thoughts about sexually abusing fictional children. While I'm not going to claim that there isn't something wrong with this man, the fact that he will be in prison for seven years for simply writing about something is direct evidence that our civil liberties mean nothing in the U.S. First Amendment? What First Amendment?

Gordon Clay from the MenStuff web site sent out an announcement reminding everyone that the U.S. Post Office Prostate Cancer Awareness stamp will no longer be available at post office branches as of September 30. My local PO hasn't had them in a while, and while they're only 33 cents (requiring an additional 1 cent stamp for first class mail), they're a great way to help remind people about the existence of this critical men's health issue.

Andrew writes "Some time ago a question occurred to me: If, as a white male, I am responsible for everyone else's suffering, then who is responsible for mine? (And furthermore: If I am responsible for my own suffering, while non-whites/non-males are not responsible for theirs, doesn't that set me apart as, well, a superior order of being? Whoops, don't want to go there!) I've never really seen this question addressed (though I do have some ideas about it myself), but this article makes an interesting (and amusing) start. Nice to see somebody (not a white man) finally say it: 'Everybody should have a white man. Even white men should have a white man. Because when you have a white man, nothing is ever your fault.'"

Aileen Wuornos, who was convicted of killing six men and claimed that she'd done so because they had sexually assaulted her, may have won her fast track to execution Friday after a Florida circuit judge said he would recommend to the Florida Supreme Court that Wuornos' execution be carried out. Wuornos recently admitted that she had lied about being sexually assaulted by men, that she just wanted to know what it felt like to kill a man. From the story: "I am a serial killer. I would kill again," Aileen Wuornos said during 1 1/2 hours on the witness stand.

This article from Excite News claims that women take longer than men to find new work after losing a job, and are more likely to choose part-time work or not re-enter the labor force at all. Surprisingly for mainstream media (Reuters), the story points out that the reason for this "disparity" is not discrimination against women, but a result of women making their own choices, especially if they happen to have a man around who is already bringing home the bacon. The article also hints at the fact that women generally have more choice about whether to work or stay home than do men.

Here's an interesting bit from Excite News. The National Organization for Men Against Sexism has organized a conference to discuss how sexism against men is a result of a "sexist, patriarchal society." The overwhelming majority of murderers and homicide victims are male, and men are more likely than women to use drugs or drink in excess. These are the results of a sexist, patriarchal society, according to Brian Klocke, a University of Colorado-Boulder doctoral candidate in sociology. Although I'm happy that these folks want to shatter male stereotypes, I don't think doing it under the flag of feminist dogma is the way to go about it.

Glenn Sacks wrote a particularly courageous editorial for the Intermountain Jewish News. In it, he describes his experiences with Jewish family and friends and the excessive male bashing he's found from Jewish women. While many people will take exception to Glenn's focus on misandry in Jewish culture, Glenn is Jewish himself, so no one can accuse him of harboring anti-semitic prejudice. In an e-mail to me he said he is not attacking Jews in general. Note: This was our 1,000th posting to Mensactivism.org!

I'd like to thank the people who have been writing in about the Media Watch page and making suggestions. I promise to update the page this weekend, as I'm busy playing catch-up with work and e-mail today.

The Worcester Telegram printed this story about the Massachusetts Child Support Guidelines hearings, with the title, "Support levels high in Mass." It's a supportive article that objectively explains the bias against Non-Custodial Parents in divorce and the reality of false accusations against fathers. How refreshing it is to see such a positive piece about an emotionally charged issue in the mainstream news!

BusterB writes "As reported in the National Post of Canada, "A survey of 350 female executives in Canada revealed that an overwhelming majority prefer incentives that allow them to attain balance in their lives...." This article outlines how women executives—the positions that feminists are always whining that women have trouble attaining—prefer job flexibility such as a four-day work week over more pay. The problem for feminism, of course, is that this kind of survey puts a lie to their claim that when women are paid less than men for the same job, it's because of discrimination."

I'm posting this article for two reasons, firstly it summarizes all his work, so please read this article very carefully and examine everything he says, and lastly, the main point Amneus makes is that by paying child support, alimony, etc, men are paying for the destruction of their own families and themselves, something that cuts close to what countless divorced dads know all too well.