Business as usual for female teacher who takes 13 year old male student out of town

Submitted by tac0965 on Thu, 2007-11-01 04:00

A Nebraska teacher takes student out of town (or state), no amber alert is issued, rape is not mentioned in the article, and the last three sentences of the article seem to try to minimize this problem. In other words, everything is pretty much business as usual when it comes to the bias between male and female sex crimes. Oh, and rape isn't mentioned once in the article. And, remember, she only POSSIBLY faces child abuse, kidnapping, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. I'm sure the whole thing will disappear from the media after they are found. Excerpt:

'The search is on for a Lexington, Nebraska middle school teacher and the 13-year-old student believed to have gone away with her.

An arrest warrant has been issued for 25-year-old Kelsey Peterson, who faces possible charges of kidnapping, child abuse and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Peterson taught sixth-grade and coached basketball in the Lexington schools. She has now been suspended by the district.
...
Fennel says all teachers need to have a balance between their public and private relationships with students.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

That's the headline on CBS online news. "Lovers"?! Give me a break! She is a perv and child rapist! He is a victim. I am getting so sick and tired of this BS. You know how the headlines would read if the genders were reversed. They would not be "lovers" in that case.

www.move-off.org
patriotsofamerica@move-off.org

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by patriotsofamerica on Fri, 2007-11-02 16:07

Are you guys certain that this boy was really a victim and that he wasn't a full-fledged willing participant?

I'm so sick of this BS coming from alleged men's activists that the young men are always victims. Was he tied up or forced to perform at gunpoint?

The implicit claim that this guy is necessarily a victim is a great example of why the men's movement will never go anywhere--a complete failure to recognize and to articulate the real issues while twisting fact patterns to suit one's agenda.

I hate to say it, but so far the women have proven themselves to be much smarter than the men when it comes to the gender wars.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by WhipperSnapper on Sat, 2007-11-03 00:28

Give me a break! That's not the point if he was "willing". Many young girls are "willing" also but the men get nailed to the wall for it. Women want to be equal and treated as such. BUT!!! When they do something like this they want to be treated as the weaker sex. Not equal. They had a mental breakdown...men are not allowed that.

Also, when this happens to boys they end up having emotional problems later on. They have problems with relationships and so forth. So don't even say that they are "willing". They are "willing" because of the way society treats them They are "willing" because of the strong sex drive at that age. After all is said and done, they were not "willing". Then they have emotional problems. Then they get locked up and the key gets thrown away because they end up being a "danger" to society...all started by these women. And in the end...the woman is declared the victim. Sick and sad if you think about it. When this happens to a girl it is tramatic. Same with a boy albiet in a different way maybe.

The law has been written. She is breaking it. She should pay just like a man...equal under the law of the land.

www.move-off.org
patriotsofamerica@move-off.org

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by patriotsofamerica on Sat, 2007-11-03 02:43

Are you guys certain that this boy was really a victim and that he wasn't a full-fledged willing participant?

I'm so sick of this BS coming from alleged men's activists that the young men are always victims. Was he tied up or forced to perform at gunpoint?

Typical FEMlogic or should I say "emotional intelligience" as women say. *Sigh* Running off at the mouth without exploring the facts present. Thus why feminists are considered idiots by many. Allow me to debunk this feminist rant..

The boy was thirteen years old. Thus whether he was "willing" or not does not matter since the age of consent in Nebraska is seventeen not thirteen. Children cannot give consent and kidnapping is a crime(especially when a minor is involved)...in case you thought otherwise.

Thus the "claim" that this child is a victim is in-fact backed up by "age of consent laws" and "laws that refer to kidnapping" which women seem to have forgotten with all of the students they are molesting, even though the media may be trying to hide the molestation which may have taken place during the kidnapping of this minor. Which is why the women's movement is such a dismal failure nearly devoid of any factual data--the women's movement has failed quite miserably when it comes to logical deduction, egalitarian views, scientific analysis, and just plain knowing when to keep their mouths shut for fear of sounding like an idiot like our friend here "Whippersnapper", just to name a few things.

I hate to say it, but so far women have proven themselves to be overly emotional imbeciles whom invade Men's Rights websites pretending to be MRAs as opposed to men who actually use logic and deduction while debunking their bullshit.

Good day..

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by MrReality on Mon, 2007-11-05 15:59