Baltimore Sun prints Glenn Sacks' column re false rape rape accusations
Via Marc A. Article here. Excerpt:
'The University of Maryland is under fire for denying activists from the Clothesline Project, a campus rape-awareness event, permission to publicly name alleged rapists. The university cites the danger of lawsuits from those named, and that's certainly a reasonable fear. Yet the university should also oppose naming alleged rapists because it could defame and harm innocent men.
A significant percentage of allegations of sexual assault are false. According to a study conducted by former Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin and published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, in more than 40 percent of the cases reviewed, the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred. Mr. Kanin also studied rape allegations in two large Midwestern universities and found that 50 percent of the allegations were recanted by the accuser.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
Can you imagine if they
Can you imagine if they wanted to publicize the private information of women convicted of filing false police reports? The backlash would be hysterical.
ADL FOR MEN??
Men should have an Antidefamation League againt false rape accusations. And we should know by now that a false rape accusation is RAPE!
Constant exposure to Rape
Constant exposure to Rape agit-prop causes some serious violence against men!!
The Feminist klans silver bullet issue is their constant rape/domestic violence hysteria!!
Both feminist klan agit-prop tactics are now under fire..as they should be!!
Excellent idea. Sue and
Excellent idea. Sue and prosecute the Mangums and Nifongs, who are many.
A false rape accusation is a
A false rape accusation is a hundred times worse than rape.
False rape victims
Why should they announce the name before trial? The mere fact that this is being considered proves that the Clothesline Project is full of man-hating crazy feminists that would do anything to protect women, especially at the expense of men. They see men as nothing more than potential rapists that would probably rape someone eventually. Better to let 10 innocent MEN get punished than to let one guilty man free. I'm all for freedom of speech, because I support it for views that I don't agree with (to think otherwise is not supporting freedom of speech), but this has got to stop. Attack men all you want as a group; accuse them of making you slaves, keeping down your wages, keeping you from getting that job that requires you to lift 200 pound objects, keeping you from being in the military while quietly opposing a draft of both sexes, keeping you from taking over yet another gym and making it female-only, or whatever your fucked up views are that day. However, the fun stops when you are ruining innocent men's lives.
Instead of hanging up a
Instead of hanging up a T-Shirt, why not put up a pair of semen-stained panties, in which the DNA doesn't match?
What Is a Legally Solid Protection for a Man?
This whole false-accusation rape syndrome is critical right now, especially since Hillary will be our next President.
So, my question is ---
What can a man do to fully protect himself from a false allegation of rape?
Is a signed "pre-screw" form sufficient?
(Probably not, especially if you bought her a couple drinks before asking her to sign it.)
Is a videotaped document of the encounter sufficient?
Probably not. She can say you coerced her into being on-screen while intoxicated, or that she didn't know the camera was in the closet.
Here's the legal truth.
Every state in America grants a woman the right to decide, for 30 days, after-the-f@&k, whether she was raped or not.
That's not just a little frightening, right?
And for you married guys -- same law. Marital rape is on your soulmate's cell speed-dial, believe it.
Of course the answer to my question is obvious.
The only 100% legal protection a man has is to avoid women entirely.
But then, cyber-stalking is now a crime.
Two or more unpleasant e-mails to any female will get you 1-12 years in prison.
Look it up.
How does it feel to be living in fear?
There's no way to prevent
There's no way to prevent it. You just have find an honest woman. Don't spend time with psycho bitches or kids.
Re: False rape victims
« Why should they announce the name before trial? The mere fact that this is being considered proves that the Clothesline Project is full of man-hating crazy feminists that would do anything to protect women, especially at the expense of men. »
blaze4metal, make no mistake. This is not about "protecting" women, this is about demonizing men. Pure and simple. How does naming accused men protect women from the real rapists?
http://petepatriarch.blogspot.com - Old, phased out due to Google's policies. Archives here.
http://petepatriarch.wordpress.com - Current.
Maz... The clothsline
Maz... The clothsline project is all about using constant exposure to agit-prop to create an anti male Klan like hysteria!!
America has a brutal history of klan like rape hysteria!!
Men deal in logic..
the femi-klan deal in hysteria/klan like mentality!!
Correct Scottkirk.
There is strong evidence that caucasian women fueled the hatred between races during the time of the klan. Even to this day white men seem to get along with other races much better than white women do. It is my opinion that many racist white women(Not all, only those who are racist such as feminists) use black men as a trump card in their "victim deck." So do black women who don't experience nearly as much discrimination as the average black man.
This is due to women(both white and black) KNOWING that they are the royal sex and that no matter how racist, sexist, misandric and selfish they are NOONE will hold them responsible. For the longest women have been treated like spoiled children with parents who never punish them. They have damn near ran this country into the ground along with the men who support them. Women must grow up and men must stop supporting -- and tolerating -- women's nonsense. In addition, chivalry must die completely before men will be free.
----------
The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek
What fueled the current
What fueled the current domestic violence hysteria? O.J.-- a black man who allegedly murdered his white ex-wife. If O.J. was white would anybody care? Probably not.