Give us back our children

Submitted by OldManSenile on Thu, 2007-07-26 10:56

From the looks of the article, mothers are losing their children to adoption agencies for no good reason. There are two fathers mentioned if I remember correctly.

But I also know thousands of men lose their kids to vengeful mothers too. For some reason, its never an epidemic unless the female is on the losing end. I wonder if it will sink in that what these mothers are going through, men have been going through it since the start of radfem leadership.

Excerpt:
"Six weeks ago, the Mail told how social workers tore a baby from her loving family to put her up for adoption. Since then, scores of parents have contacted us with horrifying stories of children stolen by the state. How dare the courts continue to gag them?
...
This sweeping shake-up in social policy was designed for all the right reasons: to get older children in care homes into happy new families with parents.

But the reforms didn't work. Encouraged by the promise of extra cash, councils began to earmark those children who were most easy to place in adoptive homes - babies and cute toddlers - while the older children remained in care. (The number of over-sevens adopted has plummeted by half in less than a decade.)

Campaigners - including parents who have had their sons or daughters taken - say that social workers are tearing innocent families apart. Everywhere, I came across evidence to suggest that these claims are justified."

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Where there is demand, supply will be created by any means necessary-- another economic rule easily forgotten. What is not being discussed here is that 30% of the human female population is "functionally sterile", with the numbers of men probably being close to the same. People who want kids (white ones, mind you) but who can't have their own used to try to adopt abroad (Russia, etc), but the prices have gotten too high and the countries too dangerous. So now, poaching one's neighbors kids is now in vogue.

Strangely, people these days are less likely now to express a desire for kids because of the cost and risk associated with it. However for those who want kids, it can be an all-consuming urge. If they can't conceive for whatever reason, they'll do whatever it takes to get them. The government knows it, and they are making money off it. Is it happening here in America, too? If not, it will soon enough I am sure. After all, London has cameras all over the place, now DC wants to do the same. Funny how GB follows the US, and the US also follows GB. When asked by citizens why our gov't is doing something, they point across the Atlantic and say, "Well, it works for the Americans/British, so we'll try it, too!"

This kind of thinking can lead two people to jump off a cliff who alone would never have considered it.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by mcc99 on Thu, 2007-07-26 15:33

Looks like adoption is part of the racket too. They're gonna milk this baby 'til the cows come home.

-ax

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by axolotl on Fri, 2007-07-27 06:15

What I'd like to see is the state step in and immediately take the child if a woman cannot produce a willing father in the hospital following the birth of the child.

With illegitimacy running at 37%, these new children should immediately be put up for adoption and made available to intact couples (1 man, 1 woman) with the financial means to adopt and raise the child.

oregon dad

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by oregon dad on Fri, 2007-07-27 18:15