Howard Schultz says mostly female cabinet would be 'benefit for the country'

Submitted by Mastodon on Sun, 2019-04-07 18:19

Article here. Excerpt:

'Former Starbucks CEO and Independent 2020 presidential hopeful Howard Schultz said that if he were elected he would form a diverse cabinet, one that would potentially include more women than men.
...
Host S.E. Cupp then jumped in to ask him to clarify what he meant by “heavily weighted toward women.” Schultz explained that “we have more women running for president than any other time in the history of the country. This is an opportunity to demonstrate that women should have the opportunity to serve the government in high positions.”

Cupp then asked if the former CEO would be interested in having women “outnumber men” in his cabinet.

“I would,” Schultz immediately responded. “I would, I think it’s a benefit for the country,” he added.'

Like1 Dislike0

Comments

... feminism stands for the idea that people's competence depends largely on their sex!

Like2 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Sun, 2019-04-07 18:40

No, it would benefit the country if Howard Schultz would shut the hell up and knock it off with the virtue signaling. -_-

Like2 Dislike0
Submitted by ErikaLancastor on Mon, 2019-04-08 03:03

Gotta love this part: "women should have the opportunity to serve the government in high positions.”"
To which my only reply can be: They already have such opportunity!!
Who is holding them back? Their imaginary "Patriarchy"?
If that were the case, then why was Hillary Clinton even "allowed" to run for president?
Here in the UK, if women were "held back" we wouldn't have ever had Margaret Thatcher and all the female MPs that we have now.
Good gosh, such delusions, these people have!
In their eyes, I rather suppose we still live in the middle ages or the like. -_-
Because that's what it sounds like, when they say bollocks like this.
*sigh*

Like2 Dislike0
Submitted by ErikaLancastor on Mon, 2019-04-08 03:10