"Juries have no place at rape trials – victims deserve unprejudiced justice"

Article here. Excerpt:

'Almost a decade ago I wrote that rape might as well be legal. I feel the same way today. In 2013-14 in England and Wales, about 16,000 rapes were recorded by police, but only a third of these cases were sent to the Crown Prosecution Service. Approximately 15% of the recorded offences resulted in a charge. The actual attrition rate – meaning from reporting to conviction – is estimated at about 6%.

One potential solution to this worrying state of affairs is to do away with jurors in sex crime trials, and appoint a specially trained judge. I am wholly in favour of our jury system, but even more in favour of ensuring that rapists and other sex offenders do not walk free. New Zealand could be the first country to rid sex crime cases of jurors if one key recommendation from a recently published report by its Law Commission is implemented. The commissioners have suggested that there is a case for having sexual violence trials decided by a judge, either alone or with two expert “lay assessors”.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Give me a break!!

Rape is a crime, that is going to be hard to prove. That's life. It does not mean we should ruin the integrity of our justice system, for the purpose of more convictions.
*edited typo

Like0 Dislike0

Like0 Dislike0

Stop the witch-hunt of males.

Witch-Hunting Males

Like0 Dislike0