Laws should reflect domestic violence against men

Letter here. Excerpt:

'Democrat Assemblyman Reed Gusciora shows his socialist, tyrannical big government tendencies. His sponsoring of legislation for a domestic violence registry is typical of tyrants acting for the “best interests” of the people, despite U.S. Supreme Court rulings that “the state owes no duty to protect residents from each other.”

His domestic violence registry to protect women is a farce and a fraud. More than 40 percent of domestic violence occurs against men, but the state Legislature is run by radical feminists, who criminally extort all taxpayers’ monies to fund their suspect domestic abuse programs. This is discrimination, Equal Protection violations, and taxpayer fraud.

In many divorce cases, men are falsely arrested and removed from their homes and children on false domestic violence because judges and police claim they have to “err on the side of caution” — and don’t want to see their names in the newspapers if something goes wrong. But, how many women go to jail for perjury for making false domestic abuse claims? Zero.'

Relatedly, also see this letter.

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Heck then, why are there police? But it wouldn't surprise me if the SC has ruled that that is the case. After all, if it ruled the state did have an actual duty to protect citizens from each other, every time you got mugged, etc., you'd have the basis for a civil suit against the gov't.

And they don't like it when you sue them. :)

Like0 Dislike0