Marc Rudov: 'Obama’s Misandry Cineplex'

Submitted by anthony on Fri, 2009-08-07 16:12

Article here. Excerpt:

'Team Obama is, perhaps, the most-misandrist bunch ever running American government. Few are familiar with the term misandry: hatred of men. Ask your friends; you’ll get blank stares — because misandry is both accepted and acceptable in our culture, as TV sitcoms and commercials prove by endlessly featuring moronic husbands and fathers.

Employing the anti-male projections of Vice President Joe Biden and almost-confirmed US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sototmayor, as well as his own, President Barack Obama is operating a veritable misandry cineplex at the White House.
...
Misandry exists in the streets, in entertainment, and in baseless and unconstitutional public policies, laws, and adjudications. But, to appear macho, men shrug it off. Don’t forget: Crystal Gail Mangum, the woman who falsely accused three Duke lacrosse players of rape, still walks this earth with impunity and freedom.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

This feminist is too stupid and reveals all the "if you can't win them - join them (and lead them) or buy someone of them" strategy used by feminists towards "MRA-movement". He probably became even more stupid than he used to be because of realizing the total collapse of feminism which has happened during the current crisis.

----------------------------------------------------
Single men is the only social group benefited from feminism. Article here.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by nbdspcl on Fri, 2009-08-07 22:47

Your comments are so Bizarro Land that I'll just list them:

    1. Marc Rudov is a feminist (!?!?)
    2. Feminists believe "can't beat em, join em (can't beat em?)
    3. ...the total collapse of feminism (VAWA, Ledbetter, WH Coun. on Women and Girls, etc.?)
    4. single men benefited from feminism (educ. crisis, Title IX, draft, CS, etc.?)

My only disagreement with Marc on the gender issue is that he sees sex as the ultimate cause of male disempowerment rather than just a proximate cause.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Hunchback on Sat, 2009-08-08 15:49

manonthestreet

I find Marc quite inspirational. There is just one observation I would like to make. He often talks about 'women trading sex for money'. This is a good point and has merit. But I would like to point out that women trade nothing for money. It is called matrimony. As I have said before marriage is the end of a man's sex life not its beginning.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by trotter on Sat, 2009-08-08 16:24

My only disagreement with Marc on the gender issue is that...

This does not disprove the statement that Rudov is a feminist. Such a similarity of views rather proves that you are a feminist too. LOL.

But any discussions here are not interesting to me since it seems that 90% of frequenters of this site are feminists, and they don't need any detailed proofs that Rudov is a feminist.

If nevertheless some non-feminist will happen to read this, and will want to see the obvious, I just recommend him to read the following passage from the article in the post with a bit more attention and remembrance of "NLP" in mind.


The NoNonsense Bottom Line

Misandry will not end until men and women take it as seriously as healthcare and taxes. Perhaps when your father, brother, uncle, son, or friend ends up in jail, like David Woods in Sacramento, whose lunatic wife stabbed him, then you’ll take it seriously and work to end it. In a country that values men and the Constitution, the police would not have arrested David Woods.

If, though, you continue passively accepting the misandrist projections of Obama, Biden, and Sotomayor — and plenty of other bureaucrats — misandry will thrive in baseless and unconstitutional policies, laws, and court decisions, and destroy more lives. Those are the consequences.

Obama’s Misandry Cineplex exists because you keep standing in line to buy tickets. Now, go project your image onto a mirror. Getting the picture?

----------------------------------------------------
Single men is the only social group benefited from feminism. Article here.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by nbdspcl on Sat, 2009-08-08 17:18

    If nevertheless some non-feminist will happen to read this, and will want to see the obvious, I just recommend him to read the following passage from the article in the post with a bit more attention and remembrance of "NLP" in mind....

1. What's objectionable (or feminist) in the quote that followed?

2. What the hell is "NLP"?

3. Am I missing some subtle MRA sarcasm, or is nbdspcl just trolling?

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Hunchback on Sat, 2009-08-08 21:50

Marc Rudov is a whimped out pussy flossing mangina feminist??????

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!!!!!!

IMO he is almost on the same intellectual level as Dr. Baskerville.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Luek on Sat, 2009-08-08 23:19

You keep to bother me with your idiotic questions although I already said you that any discussions with you are not interesting to me and you are asking who is troll here? You are pretending not to know not only what is NLP, but also what is Google? The idiocy of feminists is the exact reason of the aforementioned collapse of feminism. LOL.

I'm done with this thread.

----------------------------------------------------
Single men is the only social group benefited from feminism. Article here.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by nbdspcl on Sun, 2009-08-09 05:58

manonthestreet

Obama for sure is feminist filth. But really it's time we saw the bigger picture here. The bigger picture is summed up by asking why do we put up with any of these politicians at all? Why do we respect and obey them? All people of authority are just the same little animals as you or I. Their shit stinks just as much as anybody else's. Indeed it stinks as much as any animal in the zoo.

So why do we have them ? Judges, police officers, bureaucrats and all the other little authoritarian shits are nothing more than ordinary people. If Hilary Clinton walked into the pub and stood on a chair and said all the men in the room must go to Iraq and get killed , everyone would tell her to get lost and get on with their lives. She is nothing more than a cunt with a mouth. So why do these things when she says so on TV, or on the white house lawn. She is still just a cunt with a mouth - they all are.

Really the point is not who controls us, be it feminist filth or male bastards. The point is are we ever to be free men?

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by trotter on Sun, 2009-08-09 16:58