NY Daily News: 'Beauty killed the beast in Christie Brinkley divorce'

Submitted by anthony on Fri, 2008-07-11 15:27

Story here. Excerpt:

"She gambled and she won. Taking this divorce into a public courtroom was a risk for Christie Brinkley, but at the end of the day she got everything she wanted - and then some.

Kids? Check. Property? Check. Revenge? Oh, check, check and check.

So Brinkley ended up shelling out $2.1 million to her dirtbag of an ex. It's a small price to pay for serenity.
...
Nope, next stop on the Peter Cook train is a sad and lonely middle age in the valley of fallen men. He can rub elbows with Eliot Spitzer there."

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Once you have finished laughing at this desperate hysteric of a humiliated feminist, read interesting readers' comments here:

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story

I personally liked this one:

Rid of brat kids and a 54 yr old hag has been .. and he gets 2.1 million!?!? Party in the Hamptons tonight!

----------------------------------------------------
Single men is the only social group benefited from feminism.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by nbdspcl on Fri, 2008-07-11 19:15

It sure must be nice to be a woman. If your husband cheats on you, you get just about everything, including the kids and the house.

Now let's flip it. If you're a man and your wife cheats on you, not only will you have to pay her allimony (despite the fact that it's her fault things didn't work out), she will likely get custody of the kids despite her transgressions, and if any of the "kids" turn out to not be yours you'll still have to shell out child support for them thanks to the backwards laws which many states still follow.

It sure must be nice to be a woman.

Evan AKA X-TRNL
Real Men Don't Take Abuse!

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by xtrnl on Sat, 2008-07-12 18:41