India: MRAs fight back
Via Marc A. Article here. Excerpt:
'On August 26 this year, International Women's Equality Day, yet another demonstration was under way at Jantar Mantar, the centre of gravity for social protest in the nation's capital. No one driving by would have spared the protesters a second glance, except that the bunch shouting slogans-- "Hai Hai", "Down Down"-- was an incongruous one: software engineers, corporate managers, officers of the merchant navy and marketing execs. More incredible were the signs they were carrying: 'Stop Legal Terrorism. Stop Husband Suicides', and 'Protect the Elderly from the NCW', NCW being not the National Commission for Women but 'National Criminal Wives'. On Women's Equality Day, the centrestage belonged to one of the most unexpected byproducts of the women's rights movement: a movement for men's rights.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
Here is what I sent to the Outlook
http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20071203&fname=Husband+(F)&sid=1
In your December 03, 2007 issue, in the article, "Now is that Malevolence," the author states, "They probably got a photo of Naveen, who had spoken the other day of tiredness, incomprehension, and pain—sounding, for all the world, like a battered woman."
It's a journalistic low watermark to use the idea of a battered woman as sacrosanct, when talking about a battered man's issue. When I read that statement, it makes me think your statement in the article is correct, "that the feminist agenda has pushed ahead so far that men are now the worst victims."
Why couldn't he (Naveen) just be allowed "to sound, for all the world, like a battered man?" Would any paper in the world today dare make such a veiled, sexist sounding comparison about a battered woman's suffering?
Sincerely, Name, City, State, Country, Phone #
"Save Family Foundation"
So, those men don't want to avoid being a victim simply by not marrying. They want both to have a wife and not to be a victim. Hmm...
----------------------------------------------------
Two pillars of the World of the Future:
Asexuality
Artificial Reproduction
"What freedom men and women could have, were they not constantly tricked and trapped and enslaved and tortured by their sexuality."
J. Steinbeck.
Even if you avoid the tyranny of wives, you're still...
...a victim if you're male. Women don't have to be married to you in order to taser you and kill you. They just have to see you carrying a wad of money they want to take. They taser you. Rob you while you are lying on the ground. Run off. Then when you file a police report the cops laugh as the woman claims she was "afraid" of you and acts like she never robbed you.
Sound far-fetched? You must just be waking up to the tyranny of feminized western civilization.
----------
The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek
Victim
If she first kills you, how can you file a police report then?
Seriously though, there are ways to ease the feeling of being a victim. Among them are dumping one's wife, or, if there is no wife, not to forget about one's medications.
----------------------------------------------------
Two pillars of the World of the Future:
Asexuality
Artificial Reproduction
"What freedom men and women could have, were they not constantly tricked and trapped and enslaved and tortured by their sexuality."
J. Steinbeck.
Not all men are as gullible
Not all men are as gullible and stupid as Americans.