data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9178a/9178a8080e440b5b3c2780b00fc44bc146d81143" alt="Subscribe to Syndicate"
Feminist Hate Site: "I HATE MEN -- 100,000 STRONG"
Submitted by Mastodon on Mon, 2013-06-24 05:41
One example here. Excerpt:
'Men are the reason why the world/society is so messed up. They are the default human being, and women are stuck with the label of some kind of new creature. Double standards are because of men. War is because of men. Insecure girls are because of men.
I’m only 19 years old and I already feel this deep hatred for men. Thankfully, I have never been raped or sexually abused. But have I feared for my life because of a man? Plenty of times. I can’t walk down the street alone without fearing for my life, fearing a man will jump out of the shadows and rape/kill me. I hate that men think they own us, and that WE owe them something.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
Only 19...
... and a committed misandrist. I speculate that Hitler would've found such hatred in one so young to be heartening.
Yet it doesn't occur to her
Yet it doesn't occur to her to hate the people who made her so afraid.
evidently, she hasn't heard
mr. colt makes us all equal. the women in my immediate family, at least the older, wiser ones, fear no one. being a potential victim and living in fear is a choice, in most instances. thousands of people regularly defend themselves and their loved ones using a firearm.
she says she hates to think that women owe men anything. I've been to divorce court, pretty sure she's got it backwards.
My hope
I hope she decides never to date or even to speak to men unless it's absolutely necessary. I'd feel bad for any man who had to interact with her.
I believe feminist separatists should be encouraged to go their own way and leave the rest of us alone. I do not however condone the rise in the practice of creating segregated spaces "for women only" in otherwise public places or accommodations.
But if every feminist in the world wanted to get together and create a new country (call it "Femland" or somesuch) with arable land, water, etc., and reasonably big enough to hold them all, then I'd be all for it. Really, wouldn't they also feel so much better? And I'm talking abt feminists here, not just female feminists. So their male supporters can go with them. It'd be their chance to do it: create a feminist utopia! AND they wouldn't have to kick and scream and carry on abt how evil and patriarchal their society is! It'd be ALL THEIRS to design and live in! Their own laws and brand-new feminist customs! Their own schools! (Probably not many kids but hey, that saves on taxes.)
And on top of it all, we'd be finally rid of them. Well, maybe not. More might spontaneously arise but they could always decide later after realizing how oppressed they are to move to Femland and find happiness.
Really, everyone'd be so much happier. And it's the feminist separatists' dream come true. Really, this is not a bad idea. Just one thing: Where'd we put them? Nearly every square foot of land on the planet is claimed by someone. But they might be able to raise a lot of money and buy up a low of contiguous land somewhere. Then they could get the state (assuming it's in the US) they are in to create a new set of laws that support their utopia-creation (they are good abt getting gov'ts to do their bidding, as we know). They could create a giant single county named "Femina" or "Femland" that was chartered to allow itself to make its own laws but not be subject to state laws. They could then create their own police forces. They could create strict residency laws and req'ts and allow themselves the right to manage the comings and goings of people into and out of their new big county (not unlike what countries do). Of course, they may have to, if they are feeling really worried abt evil men coming to get them, build a huge fence around it and post armed guards to keep watch 24/7. Countries sometimes try this, or at least talk abt trying it. In history, it *has* been done a few times before: Hadrian's Wall, the Great Wall of China, just two big examples. Neither of these was of course a perfect solutio0n for the builders, but they were nonetheless remarkably effective at deterring or preventing a lot of invasions or lawlessness crossing borders.
Now all this will require money. Feminists as we know don't like to earn money for their cause; they like to get others to give money to them, especially taxpayers, via the gov't. So I suppose we'd have to expect that they would push hard for our gov't to finance a lot of what they are doing, at least to get things going. Once they have trade set up and can collect enough taxes to support their own lifestyles, then maybe... well, that's speculative at best. I doubt they'd ever stop asking whatever state they are in for money.
Still, would it be worth it just to get most of them to all go someplace together and relieve the rest of us from their incessant yammering? Would I pay to do this? Yeah. Just like paying for trash removal service.