data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9178a/9178a8080e440b5b3c2780b00fc44bc146d81143" alt="Subscribe to Syndicate"
Does feminism portend the rise of a new master race?
Article here. Excerpt:
'Beyond her feverish crusade to convince women to use birth control, Sanger was an unapologetic eugenicist. In her book The Pivot of Civilization she wrote, "More children from the fit, less from the unfit — that is the chief issue of birth control."
...
Nor could there be any doubt about Sanger's genocidal motivations. In 1926 she gave an impassioned speech at a New Jersey KKK rally and later established the euphemistically named "Negro Project." Sanger would later confide to a friend, "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population."
...
Mary Daly, former professor at Boston College, was one of the early proponents of the "goddess movement," ... In 2001 Daly wrote, "If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this process will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males."
...
Consider the millions of dollars spent for "women's health" programs, even though men die 5 years sooner than women. And ponder the irony of colleges that sponsor "women's studies" programs, while the number of men in higher education continues to dwindle.
So is it far-fetched to countenance the quest for a new Master Race based on neo-eugenic feminist ideology? Columnist Jonah Goldberg offers this terse, if sobering answer in his recent opus: "The white male is the Jew of liberal fascism."'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
manonthestreet Probably. But
manonthestreet
Probably. But this is really nothing new. We have always had a situation where the lowest form of life was the working man. Sure there has always been King and his Court but this is just the elite few. For the bulk of men their position was decidedly beneath everybody else. Women where above men as they demanded that men should support and provide for them. You know arguments about property rights in times gone by are just a red herring. Most men had little or no property and certainly no wealth. And now of course men have no property at all. If you are unsure of this just ask John Cleese.
Margaret Sanger
I did not click on the article yet, but whenever I see the name 'Margaret Sanger', I feel the need to comment.
Sanger spewed that birth control and abortion liberated women and should be part of women's "health", but her true motive was getting rid of minorities by aborting them.
I realize that I come from a very narrow sect that does not believe in birth control (the chemical type like the pill) and some of what I was taught has more to do with religious beliefs rather than medical science, but I am glad I don't give into all the women's lib crap when it comes to reproductive "health". I think I am far healthier than girls that use such options. (BTW it cannot be healthy for a woman to be in a false state of pregnancy for many years at a time - which is what the pill does to a woman's body).
I have never trusted OB/GYN doctors that perform abortions, and I do not believe that Planned Parenthood or other 'women's health' clinics have any interest in women's health. They are abortion factories! I am not familiar with the funding for abortions, but you would think they were getting rich off of it, the way they promote it.
There are many people waiting to adopt healthy babies, if Planned Parenthood wanted to, they could steer young girls into adoption, but they don't.
I have volunteered for the Dave Thomas Adoption Foundation (the late Dave Thomas was the founder of Wendy's fast food). The organization has tried to get public schools and planned parenthood to raise awareness of the option of adoption with little success.
Currently most girls with unplanned pregnancies opt for life on welfare or abortion.
Life on welfare is not healthy for mothers, children or society; and abortion is not healthy for the unborn child or the mothers (sometimes fathers also suffer depression after an abortion) . So the most healthy option IS ADOPTION! but it is the least encouraged.
I also believe that birth control and abortion contribute to the risky behavior of casual sex which leads to the spread of STDs and decline of 'family values'. Both of which are detrimental to society.
Thanks alot Margaret Sanger!
PS- Before I post this I decided to read the whole article as it speaks on Sanger's and other early feminist's desire for female supremacy by 'weeding out' or aborting males. I'm not sure if it was really a master plan or just some sick talk. Whatever, I hope they are all burning in hell.
manonthestreet Margaret
manonthestreet
Margaret sanger may well be burning in hell, but for certain men are roasting here on earth.