Article here. Excerpt:

'British actress Jameela Jamil has called for severe punishment for suspects involved in an alleged gang rape at a Cornell University fraternity house.

“I think the likes of the Cornell 7 shouldn't be allowed pen**** anymore. They used them as weapons, so now they have to be confiscated. I think jail time, legal castration and a removal of the shaft seems like the bare minimum,” she wrote on Instagram.

Her remarks came after New York state prosecutors said they have reopened an investigation into an alleged 2024 gang rape at a Cornell University fraternity house, after a civil lawsuit filed this month by the alleged victim sparked renewed outrage.'

Blunt verdict by Pearl Davis: "Feminists won, now they find out what a world without men is like." Pearl Davis gives a succinct list of feminism's cruel successes. The event was called "Word War Debate", the topic was modern feminism and gender roles. Short, fantastic clip is available here.

The full two-hour event is recorded here: "Anna Kasparian vs Pearl Davis - WW1 Main Event"

The Cornell students have already been lynched on the internet for the alleged rape of a female student. However, take a look at the District Attorney's letter explaining why no charges were filed. Excerpt:

'Before I discuss the specific facts and reasons that went into this decision, I want to provide the answer in the most basic and understandable form:

The amazing Kait Willett shares "100 brutal truths men wish women knew about dating, relationships, loneliness, respect, emotional regulation, marriage, modern expectations, and what it actually feels like to be a man in today’s world." See the video essay: "I Asked 10,000 Men What Women Don't Understand" on YouTube. The video is long, but every item in it is concise and stated simply.

This level of succinct insight is so rare. The amazing Kait Willet clarifies "What women aren’t getting about men and male dating frustration": Quote: The problem with women is that women set the standards for how other women operate. This is called interexual competition. And with social media, with Botox, filler, eyelashes, ... women continue to present themselves in ways that do not align with male preference. Men will sleep with women who are attractive. They will engage with women that they are attracted to, but that does not mean that they will commit to the same bucket or tier of women that they lust over. Those are two very different strategies for men. And women don't understand that when men are looking for a long-term partner, they're looking for consistency. They're looking for emotional regulation. They're looking for loyalty. And they're looking for somebody that they can build a life with who has those qualities, the character traits, the morals, all of those things that are aligned with their vision. Men have a vision they want to bring to fruition.

It's very easy to overlook this mini video essay on the topic of "Women punish men who adore them," because the message is not new. It contains no surprises or revelations. Nevertheless it's worthwhile to consider the profound sadness of it. The man's even-tempered delivery does not hint at the tragedy. Quote: I only wish women could understand just how badly women punish us for loving them. ... A whole generation of men have noticed that we are only treated well by women we are entirely indifferent towards. How many men are walking around full of regret for that time we were entirely too considerate to that woman we really liked? This is how fcsked up the game has gotten, for real. ... Women at least in our age group have fallen into a state of complete spiritual imbalance.

Emily King and Savanna Stone deliver a succinct list of the facts on domestic violence and divorce: "Facts!!" Quote: Highest divorce rates? Two women. Lowest divorce rates? Two men. Highest rate at of domestic violence? Two women. ... When you share these statistics, you are automatically labeled a misogynist pickme who hates women...

The Kurgan claims that "Women are overall quite incapable of seeing pretty much anything objectively, and the more personally it involves them, the less objective they will generally be." And The Kurgan presents evidence, showing that "Women rated men with a dramatically skewed distribution: they rated a full 80% of men as 'below average' in attractiveness."

Full article here, including graphs. Good luck out there in the dating market, guys.

Article here. It outlaws Dark Triad personalities. I get it. But 2 things: it won't be used against female Dark Triads and it can easily be abused to go after otherwise innocent men whose only crime was getting involved with a nutter. Excerpt:

'New family violence reforms to create a standalone criminal offence of coercive control have passed the Parliament.

Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny in her second reading speech said family violence was ‘the number one law and order issue that is destroying lives, harming children across generations and destabilising homes, communities and our broader society’.

She said the Justice Legislation Amendment (Family Violence, Coercive Control, Good Character, Risk Assessment and Other Matters) Bill 2026, was ‘about listening and responding to the voices of victim-survivors,' adding that the reforms would 'prioritise victim-survivor safety, improve the efficiency of justice processes and ensure perpetrators of all forms of interpersonal violence can be held to account'.

A fascinating look at the overlap between personality disorders and physical features of beauty, attractiveness, and mate selection. In this interview, "Why Powerful Men Fall for Borderline Women," Dr. Spier interviews Edward Dutton, a.k.a. "The Jolly Heretic," to discuss Dutton's new book: Borderline Genius, Borderline Insane. It's a terrific interview and worth listening to carefully. Quote: Evolutionary psychologist Edward Dutton joins me to discuss his new book Borderline Genius, Borderline Insane and we ask the question: have women with borderline traits had an outsized influence on powerful men, culture and history? We get into the unstable self, mirroring and attachment, whether borderline manipulation is conscious, the overlap between BPD and vulnerable narcissism, and the increasingly complicated relationship between borderline traits, autism and ADHD.

The excellent BetterBachelor delivers a brutal look at that modern activity which we still refer to as "dating": Women looking for "dates" have become ruthlessly materialistic and deceptive... so the men are adapting. See: "They set the rules, now men beat them at their own game."

Article here. Excerpt:

'I asked pertinent questions and watched selected content. On investigation, these bodybuilders turned out to be harmless bozos: they, too, ate their veg and loved their mums.

‘Is this the “manosphere”?’ I teased. ‘Are you being sucked in, do I need to turn off the router?’

‘No,’ said Sam. Then, bombshell: he declared the manosphere doesn’t really exist – that it’s a convenient label which doesn’t mean anything. Andrew Tate, he says, was a passing fad that shone for a while but then went phut. Did I know it turns out that Tate rented all those cars he had in his vids?

I did not know this. Interesting. Say more!

OK: the fuss about the manosphere was mostly because everyone in authority so comprehensively wet their pants about it. This was interpreted as a direct order to all schoolboys to start bellowing how much they loved these cross-eyed conmen. But in reality, Tate is over and those like him will follow suit. He’s as passé as Dubai chocolate or Labubus. Even the ‘six-seven’ thing is more enduring.

Article here. "If more women are elected to public office, we'll have more ethical government," was the argument. Frankly I don't see that. I see graft and corruption of all kinds from female pols, just as from male ones. Excerpt:

'An explosive sworn complaint filed with the House Ethics Committee alleges Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) carried on a sexual relationship with her district director in the office, in a car and in campaign-paid hotel rooms — and that roughly $200,000 changed hands when the staffer threatened to go to the committee.

The complaint says that after Clarice Navarro Ratzlaff left the office and told Boebert she intended to file an ethics complaint, a payment of about $200,000 followed in March 2025. Its author says he does not know where the money came from, and the passage describing how he verified the payment is redacted in the published version.

Navarro Ratzlaff is a former Colorado lawmaker who served as a U.S. Department of Agriculture official during the first Trump administration. She ran Boebert's district operation for four years.'

Hi all,

Our site has been targeted by someone or some group for a DDOS attack. If you can see this, the attack either has stopped or you've been persistent in trying to load the site. I am trying to re-route our DNS service to different servers that have DDOS protection. Hopefully that will help things.

One thing: if we're getting DDOS attacked, we must be doing something right. :)

The fantastic commentator Kait Willett prepared a video essay titled "Schopenhauer Was Right About Women All Along." Description: In 1851, a German philosopher named Arthur Schopenhauer described the exact structure that modern dating just dismantled, and laid out in precise detail what would break when it came apart.