Looks like the "murdering grannies" are gonna fight it out. Story here. Starts with:

LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Two women pleaded not guilty Wednesday to charges that they killed two homeless men in hit-and-run crashes so they could collect on the victims' life insurance.

Helen Golay, 75, and Hungarian-born Olga Rutterschmidt, 73, were being held without bail.

At the hearing, Superior Court Commissioner James Bianco denied Golay's request to use makeup, get tweezers to pluck her eyebrows, wear her own clothes and be awakened no earlier than 7 a.m. on court days.

Outside the courthouse, her lawyer, Roger Jon Diamond, explained her request.

"Any lady would want to be well groomed to make an appearance in court," he said. "If she looks haggard and not well groomed and she appears in the press, then a jury pool would be affected by that."

Feminists in charge of Harvard have long been supporting biased research (read all about what happenned a few years ago).

Well now they are explicitly working with lobbying groups. The National Network to End Domestic Violence-- a lobbying organization for women who opposed fair funding for male victims of domestic violence--is working with a researcher at Harvard University to make up more numbers about domestic violence.

I found out more about this project at this report (.pdf file).

It's on page 6. The study is going to show how many women are victims completely ignoring men and ignoring how many of these women are kidnapping their children and using federally funded hiding spots to help them.

Convicted rapist Debra Lafave has been granted permission to sit down with Matt Laurer and explain "her side" regarding the rape of a 14-year-old student. How many television interviews has anyone seen regarding a male who had sex with a 14 year old girl? She uses her bipolar disorder as an exuse. Millions of people suffer from a bipolar disorder, how many of them rape? I watched the interview (morbid curosity) and here is a direct qoute from the rapist: "He wanted it, so I gave it to him"!

Let’s say you’ve never physically abused your spouse or children. Now imagine the following scenario:

1. Your spouse accused you of domestic violence on the basis that you “harassed” her. (According to RADAR’s recent report, “Expanding Definitions of Domestic Violence, Vanishing Rule of Law,” 17 states now consider harassment to be a form of domestic “violence.”)
2. The accusation was made during an ex parte hearing, so you had no opportunity to be present during the hearing or to refute the charge.
3. As a result of the false accusation, temporary custody of your children and other benefits were awarded to the accuser.
4. State laws in 26 states require the incident to be considered by the divorce judge as a “best interest of the child” consideration. As a result, you were not able to receive shared custody, even though you never abused your children, or were never even accused of abuse.

Each year, over 2-3 million restraining orders are issued – in half those, there is not even an allegation of violence.

You know, every time one of these stories creeps up (which is quite often), I notice more and more that there is ALWAYS an excuse given for the woman's horrific behavior. It is ALWAYS somebody else's fault. Never once is a woman blamed or expected to take responsibility for any of her actions. Yet, on the other hand, there is never a legal, emotional, social, or any other kind of excuse afforded to a male. Women truly are the WEAKER sex.

A Montreal woman may avoid jail after she poured fondue fuel (mostly methanol) on a man's penis and set it on fire while he slept. The attack followed the well-known female pattern of attacking men with a weapon while they are defenseless and when the woman is in no danger herself. She was convicted of aggravated assault last year, and remains free on bail, despite having committed a violent and potentially deadly assault. Story here, with details here.

If the man had poured methanol on her and set her genitals on fire, hospitalizing her for a month with third degree burns and scarring her for life, would he be spared jail? Would he be free on bail? Will she be spared the "blame and shame", Duluth model "treatment" programs?

I'll take the issue of "violence against women" seriously just as soon as society starts taking the issue of "violence against men" seriously.

This has been a hot topic on this board for a long time. We have all been wondering if PBS would respond to criticisms of 'Breaking The Silence', a completely one-sided documentary on divorce issues and domestic violence, by subsequently showing a more non-biased documentary.

Glen Sacks' aricle is here.

Although he lauds PBS for the new documentary, he points out that there are still some weaknesses in it.

There is also a proverbial WEALTH of information on related issues at the above link. Enjoy!

The Daily Mail (of the UK) has put a story about a serial rape accuser on the front page (of both print and online versions of the newspaper) entitled Man freed but serial rape accuser remains anonymous. Excerpt:

"An innocent man jailed for a sex attack was dramatically cleared after it emerged that his 'victim' is a serial liar with a long history of crying rape.

But because of laws that protect her anonymity, judges are powerless to name and shame her, leaving her free to make more false accusations against blameless members of the public."

In their new campaign against rape, the Sun promotes many familiar myths, and makes absolutely no mention of false accusations.

Go to the Sun's website and sign their petition.

Name: STOP STIRRING UP HATRED
Address: AGAINST MEN

Feminuts Gloria Steinem and Jane Fonda are trying to start a talk radio network run by women for women. That's right folks, the femnags are now trying to take control the of the New Media which people are flocking to these days. They finally realized that it's male dominated so, as usual, they have to try and take it over and ruin it like everything else they touch. The ironic part of this news release is their characterization of the, "male dominated talk radio world as hostile and argumentative." What do they think feminists are?

Here is a blog entry from Melbourne's The Age concerning the myth of male privilege. Have a read and then join the discussion below. The author seems to have ticked off a lot of feminists. Starts with:

"I argue that men do not enjoy a life of privilege. Far from it, a look at the life of the average man is a fairly depressing sight. What kind of privilege it that bestows on men a ten-year-shorter life span than women, and a higher incidence of disease, crime, alcoholism and drug addiction? What kind of privilege is it that blesses men with a frequently self-destructive need to achieve?"

During the end of this article, CNN conducted a poll, asking if "single sex colleges" served any purpose. Out of 17,968 polled, 60% believed single sex colleges should exist. The irony? There are ZERO all-male colleges in the United States*. Many women attending this college are extremely angry and one alumna even tried to sue the university citing "legal concerns".

I suspect a feminist lawyer was hired and failed to manipulate the administration with false statistics regarding date rape and violence against women on college campuses.

---
Ed. note:

* This isn't true. There are five men's colleges left in the US. Contrast this to the 65 women's colleges that are operating (hope I got that count right, there are so many!).

MRA hunger striker John Murtari will be on a call-in talk show this Sunday at 10 am EST. You can hear the show on the internet and call in using a toll-free number. A great opportunity! Link here.
----

Ed. note: Obviously, the time has come and gone for this interview. However, a link to a recording of the interview (an .mp3 file) is found here.

Wendy (iFeminist) McElroy published an excellent piece at FoxNews that argues for closer attention to new violence statistics, defends Dr. Laura Schlessinger, and condemns (non-I?) feminists for dismissing the data. McElroy writes -

"In a recent radio broadcast and newspaper column, Dr. Laura Schlessinger addressed the 'Take Back the Night' movement that protests violence against women. She accused it of deliberately ignoring data that suggests men may be more vulnerable to violence than women. ... That PC ideology rests on the concept of women as victims and men as aggressors.

The backlash against Schlessinger was dramatic and instructive to others who consider questioning the dominant paradigm of victimhood."

The piece also includes a look at the recent Australian "Personal Safety Study," which found that "although men are three times more likely than women to be the perpetrators of violence, they are twice as likely to become victims of physical violence or threats."

Last December TV talk show host David Letterman found himself named in a restraining order. The order was granted at the request of Colleen Nestler of Santa Fe, New Mexico. Nestler alleged that for the past 11 years Mr. Letterman had been sending her “thoughts of love” in the form of mental telepathic messages and televised facial gestures.

According to a RADAR Special Report (.pdf file) issued today, Letterman’s actions indeed represent domestic “violence,” at least according to the laws of New Mexico. In that state, domestic violence is defined as “Any incident by a household member against another household member resulting in ... severe emotional distress ... [or] harassment.”

The law states “cohabitation is not necessary to be deemed a household member.” Any “person with whom the petitioner has had a continuing personal relationship” is a “household member.” So Nestler’s decade-long telepathic relationship with Letterman made him a member of her household, even though he had never heard of her.