Two "conservatives" on rape shield laws

Well well, if there's one thing two certain groups love, it's attacking the nearest man through his kids or sexuality, and in
these two cases, it's the latter. As Maggie Gallagher asks
Should rape
shields hold? And Kathleen Parker says Naming rape victims may liberate the rapist I hope you notice
how feminists put women first if it comes to a throwdown between the nearst man and woman, and how "conservatives" do the same thing. And also the fact that the paternalism they want is dependant on the
very men it will harm. In closing, I would just like to add that with the spread of information they can't hide any longer. They're dependant on our consent to do this to us, and that being modern men, saying no is a moral imperative.

NOTICE: This story was migrated from the old software that used to run Mensactivism.org. Unfortunately, user comments did not get included in the migration. However, you may view a copy of the original story, with comments, at the following link:

http://news.mensactivism.org/articles/03/08/12/2235230.shtml