The Gonzo Kid writes "I don't know whether this is believable or unbelievable. Read this: http://www.crowmagazine.com/ms-sperm.htm Martha Burke's email is capp@capponline.org. Drop her an email and let her know what you think. On second thought, it is believable. This is what "feminism" is all about; if you've ever doubted it, here's the smoking gun. Fight the Evil!!!!!"

Serge writes "Have your say." Pointing out the double standards here will be a good thing.

Martian Bachelor writes "Here's some classic damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't academic "research" on chivalry and sexism which was in the news recently. A short quote may help give an idea: "Chivalry isn't all it's cracked up to be, suggests new research showing that men who hold doors for women also tend to hold sexist views about them...""

Dan Lynch writes "This is funny and yet so true. Anyways due to administrations requests I am going to post a check list that you should check out. Just read the first comment of this thread to see an interesting view by an unknown author."

School programs exclude boys" and "Boys' advocate contends girls-only offerings in Petaluma, Sonoma illegal." See how Joe Manthey's activism is making some notice.

Dan Lynch writes "Bill Maher is getting a new show. After looking at the site I think its possible that a person can submit their own ideas for a topical discussion. Now I don't know the whole score but I believe that Maher did try to bring some men's issues to the table but was stiffled for whatever reason. The advertisement I have heard states that the guests will have far more "Freedom" to discuss their beliefs on the issues. I think this is an oppurtunity worth trying despite the high chance for *rejections*. Personally its my dream to have more feminists and more masculists debating in the same room. Let's hope Bill stands true to his word."

Trudy W. Schuett writes "Yuma AZ — After a six-month hiatus, the DesertLight Journal has returned to a regular publishing schedule. Beginning with the March issue, to appear March 1, the DLJ will contain both some familiar features and some new additions. In addition to news of the groups and orgs of the international men’s movement, the DLJ will include book reviews, news of new book releases, as well as short fiction and poetry related to men’s issues.

As in the past, subscriptions will be free. Those wishing to subscribe can go HERE

to sign up. Past subscribers are asked to also go to this address and sign up, as this is a different process than the previous delivery method.

Writers wishing to submit work should e-mail the publisher, Trudy W. Schuett, at dsrtlite@mindspring.com for more information."

This is a French website for men's activists around the world.

Dan Lynch writes "I came across a new book (Violence and Gender Reexamined) written by Professor Rich Felson and published by the American Psychological Association. The author goes on to describe that it is the 'non violence'(or chivalry) in regards to women that is the sexism. Plus a great deal more. The Author does not play to any agenda and shoots from the hip. I will post the flap synapsis of the book with written permission from the author. Also; the contents and the first chapter of this book is available upon request to my email address,(all with the permission of the author). One final note on this book. It was found in a university display. A good sign in my opinion. My email address is lynch4569@rogers.com"

IncredibleTulkas writes "It seems Progressive.com is still at it with their "voodoo doll" commercials, which portray a woman torturing a man for fun.
Apparently this is considered "humorous" despite the fact that the man is always in the receiving end-- or, more accurately, BECAUSE of this fact; the message is clearly that, the image of a man torturing a woman is considered horrendous, while the image of a woman torturing a man is hilarious.
Although Progressive.com has apparently toned down the ads from former portrayals of genital mutilation (I'm not sure since I refused to dignify the new commercial by watching it to completion), Progressive.com's simple history of misandry makes even the appearance of impropriety to be as unacceptable as Lorena Bobbit selling steak knives. Furthermore, the violent misandry portrayed in this commercial is unacceptable on its own."

warble writes "It pleases my to announce that California Senator Roy Ashburn has agreed to carry a bill crafted and proposed by NCFM, LA. For political reasons, this bill will focus on obtaining relief for the victims of default paternity judgments.

It is based on proven language that has taken years to develop and extends the efforts of Roderick Wright and Stan Dorio who have been so helpful in establishing a foundation on this issue.

Paternity fraud from default judgments is a major problem in California. For example, in L.A. County 79% of all paternity judgments are default judgments. As a consequence, California has a 120% paternity rate because more fathers are being assigned to children than were actually born. This means that we have many cases where two fathers are legally assigned to pay child support. An example of this is the Yvette and Chaka Kee family. They are victims of the actions of a fraud mom that has two fathers assigned to her child. Naturally, the corrupt and dishonest opposition supports this practice.

This bill promises, if passed, to grant relief to the poor and many families that suffer from the effects of paternity fraud. The proposed bill also allows for the recovery of damages in civil court where there is actual provable fraud on the part of the mother. NCFM, LA notes that there is no state that has such provisions as a matter of law.

Finally, NCFM-LA, CAPF, ACFC, NCFC, and others will be participating in a Paternity Board sponsored by Governor Davis to draft recommendations on the future laws relating to paternity fraud.

I'd also like to thank Roderick Wright, Stan Dorio, Dianna Thompson, Carnell Smith, Marc A., Taron James, and all those that wrote the letters when requested to petition the California Legislature for support of our proposed language. Obtaining support could not have been accomplished without everybody coming together as a team. This proves that we can make a difference when we work together as a team

Warble"

Bill Kuhl writes "Hey guys. Wendy McElroy of ifeminists.com just published an article of mine. It's about a "mini-protest" I performed at a performance of the Vagina Monologues a couple years ago. I thought it was especially appropriate now cause during Valentines (or V-day as the feminists are calling it) there will be many performances of the Monologues to coincide with V-day, to generate contempt instead of love for men. If you just go to the first page of Wendy's site it's on the right side,"My Monologues Mini-Protest." I think you'll like it."

Hunsvotti writes "Bold new idea, or just arranged marriage done right? John, like many of us, read the writing on the wall. He knew that the odds were in favor of any marriage he might join ending in a messy divorce. You know what happens next - the separation of his progeny from one or the other parent. (Most likely him, not that he actually says it.) And yet, he wanted to be a father. So he entered into a relationship of convenience with a career-minded woman who wanted to be a weekend mom while still maintaining a career. They were never in love, and they never got married - thus sparing their 11-year-old son, Stefan, from the trauma of marital disputes and eventual divorce. Both parents are interested in Stefan, just not in each other, and each pursues their own romantic interests. Is this a viable new way, or are fathers like John cruising for potentially nasty custody battles?"

Lee in Tennessee writes "I'm not sure of the laws regarding rehabilitative alimony in other states, but in Tennessee, there is no legislature that ceases this type of alimony, even when an ex-spouse lives with someone of the opposite sex, or remarries. I am not a man myself, but rather a woman that is married to a very good man that, at present, even though his ex-wife has remarried, is paying her rehabilitative alimony. I have sat through more court hearings with him than imaginable, because every time she even senses he has gotten a raise, regardless of how much, my husband is drug back into court again. I have come to the definite conclusion that in no way are the laws fair or equal in regard to men, in fact, I have come to refer to rehabilitative alimony only as "the rape of man". How can courts and judges allow women to continually destroy men financially, even after they remarry, without some protection for the man. My husband's income, even before child support and alimony, is not rich, but substantial, around $45,000.00/year. He's not even left with a third of that after he pays his ex-wife. As for the child we have together, that, according to the Tennessee courts, is my responsibility, but yet, his ex-wife's husband does not have to take any responsibility in providing for them, because they can live off of what my husband's paying them. I would love to know what can be done to change Tennessee legislation regarding alimony, particularly this kind, not only for my family, but for the other men in Tennessee that I know are experiencing the same kind of "rape"." Coincidentally, I'm just about to post an article on this very subject, so stay tuned to this website.

Dan Lynch writes "Here is an article(just click on BBC and Gender Feminsim) written by Melanie Philips who takes the BBC to task in regards to new segments that are appearing in coming weeks. Melanie points out many of the atrocities that the BBC perpetuate for the myths of domestic violence. How monopoly networks can maintain status quo and politically demonize men wholesale. Another Journalist (Jennie Bristow) points out the flaws of 'Hitting Home' campaign in her article"A Licence to Indoctrinate". With the indoctrination tactics and the fearmongering designed to make us suspicious of our partners. She alludes that the government is trying to invade our homes. Which is something I blatently state."