Boy Lured by Photo of Pamela Anderson's Breasts Into Sex With Co-Worker

Story here. This woman somehow justifies her actions because he was a 'big strong boy'. Absolutely sickening! Excerpt:

'A 32-year-old woman sent a picture of Pamela Anderson's breasts to a 15-year-old workmate shortly before beginning a sexual relationship with him, the Supreme Court in Launceston has heard.

Courtney Isabella Bailey, now 34, told police that the boy had tested her asking her for a picture of her breasts – but she sent a picture of the Baywatch star's breasts instead.

Bailey received a four-month suspended jail term today after pleading guilty to five counts of unlawful sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 17 in January 2007.'

Bailey had remarked to his parents that he was a "big strong boy" for a 15-year-old."

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

i guess men can expect to start getting 4 mo. suspended sentences for
repeated sex w/ 15 y.o. girls?

if they are really BIG girls for their age.

must be something in the frackin' water.

Like0 Dislike0

I hope Warren Jeffs of the FLDS knows about this. He could get out with time served.

Like0 Dislike0

These kind of "slap on the hand" sentence given to women for serious crimes like statutory rape,happens all the time.The double standards in the courts and by judges are irresponsible,and reprehensible.If these judges were elected remember them when it comes voting time and vote these pandering incompetent ass's out.These same judges have no problem of sentencing a man to 10 or 15 years for the same identical crime,and there's no shortage of this kind of unfair, injustice,everywhere you look.Statutory rape is a serious crime,and the sentencing guideline should be the same for women as it is for men,pure and simple.The law doesn't say statutory rape is crime,unless you're a woman.

Like0 Dislike0

How many of you guys were looking for sex when you were 15 years old? Personaly I don't find what happened so terribly wrong. Same if it were a 15 year old girl, and an older man, if the girl was acting sexually aggressive towards the man. Perhaps we should legalize houses of comfort for both men, and women. We as Human Beings need to be relaxed, sex is healthy. If there was a safe place for People to go and relieve their stress without games, we might be a more happy, healthy society. The current system is designed to oppress, so we need to change the system; instead of crying for the same amount of oppression for all why not end oppression all together?

David A. DeLong

Like0 Dislike0

David,I agree with you in many ways. However, keep in mind that the definition of rape and sexual harassment are entirely from a feminist perspective. The laws are completely one sided. Here is where men need to protest and demand change. Speaking from experience, and no B.S. fellas, from age 14-16, on two occasions I was "initiated" by two women much, much, much, much older than me. In no way did I feel humiliated, molested or abused. To me , I just got plain lucky. In no way did I experience any state of depression, become self-destructive or become some sex addicted crackpot. Speaking to other men who had the same experience most felt the same as I did. Due to the way our society treats each gender, differently, the dynamics in terms of experience regarding "statutory rape" differs for each sex when seduced by an older individual of the opposite sex. For the most part, females are very vulnerable in this respect and fall apart from that experience (according to Steinam, Oprah and Lifetime). I believe it is for this reason that these sex patrol assholes try to ascribe the same female perceived experience of "statutory rape" onto the male experience. By doing so, women therefore are not perceived as being weak and fragile by this experience alone. Now, before anyone chews my head off, I am not saying that it is right. There should be some form of consequence, however because of the male attitude towards sex, we are far more powerful and not as fragile as the female sex and as a result our experience should be handled differently regarding statutory rape. To do so would render the feminist argument of women being emotionally stronger than men as a total bullshit, which will open the door for further evaluation of this topic where men can take advantage and help redesign reform of this most controversial issue.

Like0 Dislike0

The main point to remember in my opinion is the double standards in the sentence given to men for the same identical crime commited by women.Remember there is no legal consent with having sex with a minor by an adult,... It doesn't matter how "willing" the minor is,young girls can just be as willing as the young boys,but by the law it's a crime.The only difference is the women offenders receive only a tiny fraction of the sentence as men get for the same identical crime.

Like0 Dislike0

Just today a defrocked 74-year-old Pennsylvanian priest was sentenced to ten years for traveling to Long Island to have sex with a teenage boy. No physical sex took place.

Like0 Dislike0

Jazzman and Hunchback, both of you are right and I couldn't agree with you more. There is definitely a double-standard when rape crimes are committed especially statutory rape. This is because the subject of human sexuality is distorted by feminist propaganda, females:pure and innocent, males: horny and predatory, which leads to a dishonest handling of the matter. The emotional part of me says she should get hit with the book full force as would a man. However, the logical part of me says , what was the fucking harm? Of course the child's age should be considered , big difference between a child who is six or seven vs a 15 or 16 yr old. Feminism has been very successful in propelling laws designed to use our libido's against us in all situations as possible, although some very valid. This poses a big challenge for men and we're going to have to throw a lot of punches before we see any improvement. Hunchback, at the risk of being considered a homophobe, concerning the defrocked priest traveling to have sex with a teenage boy, I can't nor will I justify this in anyway, this pedophile son of a bitch. Yes, a double standard on my part but it is my firm belief that male rape against another male has far more damaging consequences against the victim's pysche than if it were committed by a woman. Sorry if anyone takes any offense to that.

Like0 Dislike0

Yes I agree with you,but again what if the crime was a women with a girl?same outcome,a slap on the hand for a sentence.The same identical crime with the same damaging conequences,but only a fraction of the sentence given to the woman (if any sentence at all)as is given to the man.This kind of double standard happens all the time,in all kinds of crime,up to and including murder.On average, the senence given to women as compared to men for the same crime is just a mere small fraction.One more thing,a lot of the time in cases were a woman is on trial for a crime against a man,the judge is being intimidated by feminist groups.This is especially true in murder case's where these feminist groups will claim the woman was the victim,even so there's not one "shred"of evidence to back up their allegations.And futhermore they succeed many of the times.This is a national disgrace.

Like0 Dislike0

Jazzman, we have a lot in common. I agree with all of you. The concerns are sound and certainly have to be addressed. Please let me make myself clear, If a woman murders a man in cold blood, give her ass the "chair". If a woman murders her children, the hell with that postpartum bullshit, give her ass the "chair". If a woman murders or maims her husband because he cheated on her, give her ass the "chair". The unfairness in the carrying out of justice when the same crime is committed by a man as did a woman is something men have to bring out to the forefront, not by asking but by taking charge and demand changes. As for rape, that too has to be overhauled compared to how it is handled currently. However, regarding statutory rape, when such a thing is committed, the age of the "victim" must be considered. Was the child 7 yrs of age or were they 15 or 16 yrs of age? How old was the predator? Was the victim 14 and the "predator" 17 yrs of age or was the victim 14 and the predator 45 yrs of age?Was the predator of the same sex as the victim? We all know how I feel about same sex rape especially against a child which to me is far more damaging than that of the opposite gender. Whether the crime was committed by a man or woman the punishment should be carried out the same. On the other side, to brand a 20 yr old male as a rapist because he had CONSENTING sex with a 16 yr old is very extreme as it is wrong. I can continue further with the dynamics between female cougars and young boys but I won't lest get my ass chewed out. I for one love sex with women just been fortunate enough to not allow myself to be held hostage or controlled by it. You guys are all awesome! The men's movement is going to be HUGE and spread like wildfire and so much sooner than we all think.

Like0 Dislike0

I worked as a Corrections Officer. It was not long only about a year. The women in the detention center I worked in that did the same crimes as the men got lower years in the slammer. Walking through the women's pods, the women were more disgusting than the men's pods. The women themselves were worse than the men. The women were more devious than the men. I had to watch my back with the women inmates.

That being said, we had a mother and a father there. The mom, to punish her 14 year old daughter, FORCED her to have sex with her father. Granted the father committed the act, the mom FORCED it on her daughter. The father got 2 times the years as opposed to the mother.

www.move-off.org

Like0 Dislike0

Age of consent in Germany is 14 and frankly said this is much more realistic than the puritan "under 17/18/whatever" you have there in the US.

Now they only need to apply the same standards to men over there.

Like0 Dislike0