"Feminists Have More Fun"

.. who brought you the story about men dying earlier due to competition for sex. 'nuff said.

Feminists do NOT have egalitarian attitudes. "You can't prosecute false accusers because that would discourage real victims from coming forward!" is not egalitarianism.

This report is an affront to lesbians, gays, transgendered, and still-deciding-my-gender persons everywhere, and it should be suppressed as blatant heterosexual propaganda!

(Excerpts) -

Among the findings:
• College-age women who reported having feminist male partners also reported higher quality relationships that were more stable than couples involving non-feminist male partners. (TRANSLATION – "I like my pussy, and his name is Hugo!")
• College guys who were themselves feminists and had feminist partners reported more equality in their relationships. (TRANSLATION – "My pussy lets me go out with other pussies twice a month.")
• Older women who perceived their male partners as feminists reported greater relationship health and sexual satisfaction. (TRANSLATION – "He likes my old saggy pussy.")
• Older men with feminist partners said they had more stable relationships and greater sexual satisfaction. (TRANSLATION – "Gettin’ more ass than a toilet seat!")

I know that was bad. Very bad.

But the report was side-splitting funny!

No way Kim Gandy at N.O.W. will be commenting on this one.

Livescience seems to put out some pretty childish articles. I don't see too many "scientific articles", but I see alot of political pandering. I mean come on "feminists have more FUN?" Notice the so-called "study" was conducted by two women at a COLLEGE campus. A known hotbed of misandry, which is why men are not attending college as much anymore. Colleges are the main ones supporting changing Valentine's Day into a rape hysteria day called V-Day based off of feminist lies. Sure conduct a study about male bashers(i.e. Feminists) in their territory. That's like me conducting a study on whether lesbian relationships are "having more fun" at the N.O.W. headquarters with two lesbian members of N.O.W. conducting the study.

Not to mention how do you gauge "fun" scientifically? Is there a FUN-METER? Then they go on to basically say they have no evidence whatsoever(What a surprise that you cannot scientifically quantify FUN relationships) by admitting they don't know how they came to these conclusions. Like always however Yahippies never fails to jump up and support feminist junk science like when they said scientists found aliens on Mars. I think that was from Livescience too.

It seems to me that feminism has a bad name and now the pundits -- mainly women and weak men -- are attempting to swell their ranks by saying it is FUN. They know such peabrained terminology appeals to America's young women and hope to draw them in by saying they will have FUN being a male basher. Of course it's going to work; I have no confidence in the female gender. If a 90-year old woman can get sucked in by a hate movement than it will be a landslide for a bunch of dumb young american girls.

I am SOOOO ashamed to have quoted one of their "studies." God what is happening to me?

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

I just an article just the other day about how men now claim to be happier than the were twenty-five years ago, while women claim to be less happy, because they have too many responsibilities (having to work and take care of the kids, etc.). That's the exact opposite of this, although I have no idea why men would be happier considering the bullshit we're subjected to.

I had to find that out the hardway. You see when claiming women are not happy and men are they make a "study" about that. When they need to say women "are happy" about working and being man-haters they make a study about that. It's not based on any real evidence they just make a study about whatever message they are trying to impress upon you at that moment. They lie at will.....sad.

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

I do think that feminism has hurt women, and hurt them quite badly. But many people think that "feminism" is the same thing as "women being better off" or "women's rights" even (yes, feel free to laugh) "equality." The sisters have done a lot to help prostitutes lie under oath and get away with it, but what have they ever done to help decent, successful women?

Not to mention how do you gauge "fun" scientifically? Is there a FUN-METER?

I had 7.5 units of fun reading this post.

I recently found an article confirming what we already knew. Laurie A. Rudman -- and her partner -- are feminists themselves and started the so-called "study"(If that is what you want to call it. Who the hell conducts a scientific study with an online questionnaire or questions a handful of women at the very school they teach at? LoL) that claims "feminists are more fun."

I will post a link to the article but here are some interesting snippets I snatched from it. Guilty as charged bitches:

Quote 1. ""They're not man-hating lesbians and all that sort of stuff," says Laurie Rudman, an associate professor at Rutgers University in New Jersey who co-authored the study with PhD student Julie Phelan."

Quote 2. "But is anyone except Rush Limbaugh still railing against those fearsome "feminazis" any more?

Apparently, yes. We may have come a long way, baby, but stereotypes about feminism just won't die.

"People avoid the 'F-word,' " Dr. Rudman says. "The idea you cannot be a feminist and feminine at the same time is huge in the popular imagination."

Dr. Rudman documented the persistence of the F-word stigma in a study published this summer in Psychology of Women Quarterly. She surveyed hundreds of university students and found they believe feminist women are uglier and less likely to find romantic happiness than non-feminists.

"These are ideas I thought went out with my grandma's gartered stockings, but it turns out they are still a concern," Dr. Rudman says. She's also heard similar attitudes in conversations with university-aged women who don't want to identify themselves as feminists.

Dr. Rudman suspected that feminism's reputation as a romantic buzzkill may be scaring young women away from adopting the label, so she decided to investigate whether those stereotypes held any truth."

Quote 3. ""Who wants to have all the power in a relationship, or to be on the other end, where you have no say in anything?" Dr. Rudman asks.

For now, she hopes her research will, in some small way, help young women embrace feminism without fear of losing their romantic mojo.

"There's a lot of work to be done," she says."

Bitch come on. Online surveys(Who conducts actual scientific research on the internet? LoL), questioning your own students, "there's a lot of work to be done", overly concerned with feminism's outlook, actually creating a "fun" study, being a feminist herself. Her partner is on the same level as she is. This is not science....it's activism. I've debunked lies that were put together well but this crap is falling apart without me even touching it.

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

The good news is this ridiculous article and its bogus scholarship shows that the feminists are on the defensive. They are seeing their bullshit castle start to crumble lie by lie, so they have to create drastic lies; like the feminist fun-meter. Men are starting to push back and women are feeling the heat. If women choose feminism they deserve to get burnt by their own lies.

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

The reason young women today are rejecting feminism is the very same reason that young women thirty years ago embraced it.

Simply put - women saw an advantage in feminist ideas back then ("you can have it all girl!"); and today, not so much.

Why?

Because what young women want has not changed in forty plus years since second wave feminism.

Google it if you will, but even the richest, smartest, most privileged young women want the same traditional dramatic formula to happiness -

Act One - Get admitted to an elite university and secure your degree. Get a great job and immediately start hunting for the main protagonist in Act Two -- your hubby, wallet, meal ticket.

Act Two - After a couple years of high earnings and screwing every doctor and lawyer and stock broker you meet, pick out the ONE, i.e. your "soulmate." Get pregnant, get married, get set for a minimum of 18 years of living large as a socker mom.

Act Three - Divorce him if you're bored, after the kids are off to college. Anyhow, insist that you should be entitled to re-enter your high-paying career with the same or better salary as when you chose to quit, even though you've been absent from your profession for two decades, and have zero marketable skills.

Act Four - there is no act four. It's just too messy to deal with and nobody gets a happy ending.

That's Feminism Inc! The ideal fantasy.

...into your little "Mr. Roy's neighborhood" theory here?

Begin sarcasm: Any stupid ass internet "homey"(LoL) that thinks all women just want to get pregnant, married or "set" after working is a moron. He should judge each woman separately and praise hookers when they make false rape accusations. /sarcasm>

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

Having a feminist for a wife means a stroke at 50 because she never has enough....she will ride you like a mule!!!

"women with egalitarian attitudes do find mates and men do find them attractive."

That's probably true. However, most of those women with egalitarian attitudes are not feminists - not by today's standard.

-ax

women control men through sex and hysteria!!

men are catching onto the hysteria, so the feminists need to keep the sex option alive in the male psyche!!

Here is a comment from the discussion on this at Yahoo. This man hits the nail right on the head:

"All this study means is that selected samples of feminists tend to lie quite a lot about their sex lives.

It was conducted by two feminist researchers and published in a feminist journal for crying out loud. Half of the data collected was done by 'online survey'.

Personally I think it is pretty pathetic when feminists create online surveys directed at feminists about feminists sex lives in a lame attempt to prove something like feminists have better sex lives.

Just goes to show how damnedly insecure feminists are about this sort of thing."

Zing! Lmao!

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

..just the overall dynamics of the relationship; and they are speaking for the male partner, whereas he himself might give a different response.

But do you think feminists will ever ask for a male perspective on things?? Not unless 99% of the sample is honorary women.

-ax

"Does he enjoy the sex? Shit, of course he does! Wouldn't you?" Oh yeah, Gloria; seeing you talk about Michael Jackson really makes me want to hit it (gag).

...how "feminists" are conducting an 'online survey & a survey of students at a school they teach at' -- with the aim of selling feminism to the masses(Confirmation Bias at work) -- and how they then claim this shoddy method somehow exonerates feminists from being man-haters.

Hey, I want to claim asian men are gods. I think I'll hire an asian man that believes he is a god and who also conducts classes at a school named: "Asian men are gods University." His methods will be questioning "selected students" at this university while hosting an unreliable "online survey" which should serve to enforce his -- and my own -- Confirmation Bias and quackery.

Afterwards I'll pat myself on the back when the "scientist" with a god complex "amazingly" concludes asian men are indeed gods. I shall then refer to this pseudoscientific quack job as "scientific evidence." LoL!

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

Sorry MrR, I just now read your post.

I was on the road for a couple great Bob Dylan '07 concerts. (You know, the ancient rebel 60's pale rapper still on his never-ending tour?)

I respect your rhetorical combativeness.

Now, if you would just do a little more research, and not rely on "philosophical profiling", I believe we could collaborate on a truly interesting dialogue.

But first, I have to stop demeaning your voice/identity.

Secondly, you have to stop demeaning my voice/identity.

You first, OK? ;-)

For folks observing this 'Net street comedy, I'd suggest this is an experiment in MRA ... political DNA.

The feminists think we are just incapable of anything other than stupid "masculine" self-destruction and fight-club mentality.

There is nothing trivial about this site.

It is a crucial experiment.

MrR ... what do we have in common?

Other than being able to type, and affording access to the Internet?

If 10,000 years of civilization don't convince the feminists of our ability, nothing posted on this board will.

As for Bob Dylan, I think he should stop ripping off classic blues musicians like Freddy King, changing the lyrics and recording it...

"Philosophical profiling".
While not as common as gender profiling, it may be almost as harmful. Of course feminists and others say, "men think too linearly", are "overly analytical" and that kind of horseshit. People (such as psychotherapists) who say things like that, usually lack the insight to be philosophical themselves.

Sorry to change the subject.

-ax

She has enough real action going on, and can thus point the finger at any of dozens of non-fictional men (she just has to remember which one was the doctor, and which was the homeless guy, in case child support issues come up).

I think lawmakers should legalize prostitution anyway, at least the call services. Prostitutes are the unsung single mothers of society. They should at least be saved from the burden of sitting in jail cells, or wondering where their next fix is from.

-ax

"Freddy King played with a plastic thumb pick and a metal index-finger pick. He credited Eddie Taylor with having taught him the use of the picks."

It's called learning, crediting --- not ripping off.

Dylan studied, appreciated, learned, and adopted and evolved.

Man, take some college classes in blues history and report back, OK?

Or maybe just go on down to the southside clubs in whatever city you reside and listen after midnight.

...it's about men's rights. Let's try to stay on topic here.

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

"Dylan studied, appreciated, learned, and adopted and evolved."
True.

Too bad he can't sing worth a rat's ass. He sounds like he smoked ten thousand packs of Lucky Strikes by the time he was 16.

He's also quite ugly, even when he was younger. He looks like a predator. Call the police.

-ax

Ax, you have me holding my side from laughter over here.

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek