Study: Men often coerced into sex
Submitted by Scottie on Sun, 2007-09-23 17:10
Something interesting from the National Post... here's the link.
"The stereotype of the male stud who is always up for sex is being challenged by new research from the University of Guelph showing that men are almost as likely to be coerced in the bedroom as women.
A study of 518 university students found that 38.8% of men and 47.9% of women reported being pressured into a range of sexual activity, from kissing and cuddling to intercourse and oral sex."
- Log in to post comments
Comments
This study SHOULD come accross as 'duh, of course that's true!'
But sadly, that's not the case. Those moron 'couples therapists' are COMPLETELY missing the boat when it comes to their male clients.
In his Vancouver sex therapy practice, David McKenzie said he has counselled thousands of couples whose most common complaints are women with low sex drive followed by men with a sexual dysfunction.
Gee, maybe that fuck head doesn't get it because he get a kick back from Pfizer every time one of his "dysfunctional" male clients gets a script for Viagra or Cialus.
I would guess about 9 out of every 10 men on those fucking drugs have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING wrong with them accept that they believe they are supposed to be walking mechanical sex toys for any horny woman. Men are not all sex all the time, just like women aren't. Unless you have a medical condition that causes sexual dysfunction like diabetes or heart disease, chances are you don't need no fucking pills, you just need to learn that you are not required to be a walking erection for any woman demanding a quick fuck. Let her fuck a cucumber if she's that horny.
About fucking time some one stumbled upon the truth in a fucking study like this.
Now we need to IMMEDIATELY rethink ALL sex crime legislation EVERYWHERE ON EARTH to take into account something that has been true since the dawn of time yet somehow we are just waking up to realize now.
How can most people go through life so absolutely fucking clueless about human sexuality? We really need to start having a public discourse on this shit cause people really have some fucked up ideas about the birds and the bees. A study like this should surprise NO ONE.
Paragon...
"chances are you don't need no fucking pills, you just need to learn that you are not required to be a walking erection for any woman demanding a quick fuck."
That statement is so fucking eloquent, I am almost moved to tears. I am committing that one to memory.
Tell me where to send the royalty cheques. ;-)
Viagra? No.
I'd bet most Men with erectile disfunction are predominantly bored.
Replace that "fat sow" of a wife with a tight bodied 20 year old race horse and you'll see a marked difference in his "disfunction".
oregon dad
Research means nothing. Let's not wait for their green light...
...to reveal what reality already shows. One only needs look at how wild and uncontrollable women are these days and you can easily see who is more obsessed with screwing. Moreover any intellectual conversation with the majority of women will usually get turned into something dealing with sex whether it is sex as one's gender or sex as in procreative activity.
Sex is also one of the very first insults women hurl at men(i.e. You need to get laid! You're just bitter because noone wants you! Blah, blah, blah) that do not believe in the "protect all women and ladies first" all-american dream.
Sex is women's main weapon in getting what they want from men whether it is giving it up freely(read pussywhipped) or withholding it until he acquiesces to her desires.
------------------------------------------------------
"Why do they(women) constantly stand before the fairy-tale mirror-on-the-wall, to reassure themselves that they are the most beautiful, the smartest, the most courageous? Because they are compelled t
38% of men?
Wait until there are 50.1% and then it can be said that all women are potential rapists.What about dildoes etc,
women must use them on somebody.anyone know any percentages?
confirms prior studies
In the Summer 2000 issue of "Sexuality and Culture," a peer-reviewed journal, Fiebert published a bibliography summarizing about 40 studies that reached the same or similar findings, i.e., sexual coercion happens to men at rates comparable to women.
Wait until there are 50.1%
Wait until there are 50.1% and then it can be said that all women are potential rapists.
Doesn't matter what the percentages are, they're all potential rapists now. Technically feminists are correct when they state all men are potential rapists. Just as all women are potential rapists. Where has any of their hypoerbole gotten us? Nowhere, because it's useless information. It's like saying all people are potential arsonists. Does it help us prevent arson? No.
Coercion? Or a Free Choice?
All this nonsense about either gender being "coerced" or "pressured" into sex is really insulting.
It assumes that you are an infant, that you are too stupid to refuse a trip to 18 years of child support, that you have no control over your own choices. (Indeed, that pussy rules in your head...)
It is really time to settle down and understand what it means as a man to be living in a GENDER WAR!
I could state the obvious manifesto...
But what do mensactivisms' posters think?
But what about the journalistic bias?
It is interesting how the first third of the article lays out the ugly truth while the remaining two thirds tries to blunt and refute that truth.
Cajoled Into Submission?
(Quote from the link) -- "The study defined coercion as everything from mild cajoling to full-blown sexual assault."
MILD CAJOLING?!!!
WTF is THAT?
If a woman puts her hand on your thigh, have you been cajoled... or coerced?
If a man brushes his fingers over a woman's elbow, has she been assaulted?
Thank you Andrea Dworkin and Valerie Solanis and all you feminist bitches!
It will take two more generations to heal the toxic puke you have "penetrated" into American gender relations.
But this is what happens,
But this is what happens, they want to expand the definition of these issues so include more men, and more women get caught in the wide net they're casting. If they had limited the definition to actual sexual assault, which I'll define as a person who uses force, the threat of force, or a person's incapacitation to force someone into having sex with them, then two things would happen.
A) The gap would widen between women and men, showing a higher percentage of male perpetrators than female, which would help the feminist cause, but they won't do this because...
B) The number of perpetrators would go WAY down, and numbers such as "2% of women report being sexually assaulted" just don't feed into the "all men are rapists waiting to happen" hysteria they seek to promote.
Harvesting Men Starts Early
It's perhaps worth noting that there are almost no cultural messages that encourage men to examine the consequences of their surrender to pussification and the mythology of vagina worship.
What if there was a mandatory high school sex ed class for young men that actually laid out (pun tragically intended) the consequences, costs & benefits, and self-destructiveness lasting a lifetime for impregnating a girl before you have even started to build your own identity and career?
Do yuh think it might result in fewer "beatdead dads?"
Yes.
I actually think men should be educated early on in their lives on how manipulative women are and how the system is set-up for women to gain and remain in power while men remain slaves. The nature of the predatory female is something young men -- and all men -- MUST be made aware of! Any man going out into the world with an optimistic view of women is setting himself up to be castrated.
------------------------------------------------------
"Why do they(women) constantly stand before the fairy-tale mirror-on-the-wall, to reassure themselves that they are the most beautiful, the smartest, the most courageous? Because they are compelled t