Father absence correlated to brain development impedence
Feminists have painted themselves into a corner by ignoring medical science. Soon to be published research: humans have a cross gender parenting brain, and then there is the maternal brain and the PATERNAL brain.
Men always knew how to father their children, it's hard-wired, even Dr. Spock advised and to paraphrase "Let fathers do with children what comes naturally to them."
The following citation to quote:
'On the behavioral level, a variety of studies in humans have reported a correlation between the absence of the father during childhood and the risk for alcoholism, poor educational performance, aggressiveness and criminality (Vaden-Kiernan et al., 1995; Baskerville, 2002).
...
The analysis of animal models, in which the impact of distinct familial constellations on synaptic maturation can be identified and quantitatively characterized, may serve as a basis for understanding the endocrine and neuronal factors, which mediate experience-driven neuronal and synaptic malformations and at later life periods result in the development of behavioral and cognitive deficits as well as mental disorders.'
AND
'Our results query the general assumption that a father has less impact on the synaptic maturation of his offspring's brain than the mother.'
IN OTHER WORDS, FATHER ABSENCE (WITHOUT CHILD-MOTHER ADVERSITY) PRODUCES BRAIN RETARDATION IN THE POSTNATAL INFANT BRAIN.
- Log in to post comments
Comments
Here is the article citation
"Lack of Paternal Care affects synaptic development in the anterior cingulate cortex" Wladimir Ovtscharoff Jr. , Carina Helmeke , Katharina Braun.
Brain Research 1116 (2006) 58-63.
The paper can be obtained on line from ScienceDirect.
"Men always knew how to
"Men always knew how to father their children, it's hard-wired, even Dr. Spock advised and to paraphrase "Let fathers do with children what comes naturally to them.""
Oh, but that would imply that father's have instincts when it comes to children. Everyone knows only mothers are aware of how to care for children.
Of Course! But did they
Of Course!
But did they realize there IS a paternal style of nuturing AND THEIR
chauvinist maternal style!
Probably
In order to reach such a conclusion the study must have observed fathers caring for their children. Unless the males in the sample group were made up entirely entirely of 'new age men' then they must have noticed differences in the way fathers care for and nurture the children. I think the point is they discovered neither way is necessarily better and both have equal benefits for the children. Kids need parenting from both mom and dad - and by dad, not just any random male mom happens to like taking it in the ass from will do - no other man can replace the biological father.
Of course this all used to be common sense, but alas, feminism along with government fear mongering on other issues like terrorists and immigration conquering all of the middle east and what not have completely taken the place of common sense in my peoples minds.
Actually it all boils down to an anagram
Mother's influence: PRENATAL
Father's influence: PATERNAL
Both together: PARENTAL
Sorry..couldn't resist :-)
-ax