Police: Woman ties up lover, drinks his blood

The article titles the as such but seems to indicate that they only knew each other a couple days. How does that make them good acquaintances?

She'll walk though, I put the odds of conviction 100:1 against. Any takers?

Why?

First there is that age difference. Everyone knows that a 45 year old man who's with a 23 year old woman is the victimizer. He's just so obviously a pervert who took advantage of this poor homeless girl.

Then, there's he is said to have agreed to be tied up, further reafirming he's obviously an old pervert and not deserving of the courts sympathy.

And he was drinking and doing drugs. Further social vices.

I know, I know... feminists would like nothing better then for alcohol and drugs to invalidate any consent given by a woman to sexual activates, however they don't want the same rule to apply to men who are inebriated and consent to things they might not have if they were sober.

That and courts already tend to put responsibility on males (and religiously tow the feminist party line) regardless of circumstances.

The court will say something along the lines of, he made poor choices to hook up with some psycho homeless chick, but that he still made the choices none the less and therefore he got what was coming to him. As far as the psycho homeless chick goes, they'll probably say she's in need of help and offer her shelter services, money, lawyer and police services to hunt down and punish the men from her past that made her psycho and homeless because no woman deserves that.

Men simply don't have the right to withdraw consent at any moment the way women do. He said yes at first so he obviously wanted everything that followed. It was just the drugs that made him hallucinate and think this woman was a danger to him and he really was into it despite his actions. She meant no harm, just ask her, she says he was into it in the article.

Wonder why they don't ask male rapists whether or not they think the woman they raped wanted it? I can't remember the last time I read a story about a man raping and torturing a woman where his views on the situation were reported in the story of his arrest.

Who's gonna bet she gets what she deserves (what she deserves would be the exact same sentence a man would get in the situation if the genders were reversed)?

Woman drinks man's life blood?
This is just a literal case of blood sucking.
So where is the story here?

Try paying child support in Michigan!