School accuses 5-YO boy of sexual harassment
Story here. Excerpt:
'Charles Vallance, the boy's father, said he was unable to explain to his son what he had done.
"He knows nothing about sex," Vallance said. "There's no way to explain what he's been written up for. He knows it as playing around. He doesn't know it as anything sexual at all."
The incident was described as "sexual harassment" on the school form.
...
The incident will be included in the boy's file while he remains at Lincolnshire, but Mowen said those files do not follow students when they move on to middle school.'
THIS ABOUT SUMS IT UP: Washington County Public Schools spokeswoman Carol Mowen described the incident as a "learning opportunity."
---
Ed. note: This is a different story than the one posted on Dec. 10 regarding the boy accused of "sexual harassment" for hugging a teacher's aide.
- Log in to post comments
Comments
Reminiscent of Soviet "wrecking" laws
Well as long as the "perp" is a male child, anyway... the Soviets used to charge children with "wrecking" for eating produce on a farm without state permission. Wikipedia entry on "wrecking laws" is here for those who slept through that part of European history class.
One of the signs of a totalitarian state is the criminalization of behavior in young children that would necessarily be considered criminal in an adult. The state's expectation that a child can perceive and judge to the same degree as an adult is a sign that it has gone from merely maintaining civil order to oppressing its people. We have arrived.
Brave new world
Totalitarianism is the keyword to what's currently happening. Women are natural born slaves and the masculinity is the only force in society which resists the total enslavement. Because of this any signs of masculinity are eradicated by the ruling social system from men beginning from their early childhood. Most probably that boy apart from disciplinary punishment, after that incident will be also receiving ADHD treatment until age 18.
Criminalizing Masculinity Doesn't Work...
So instead, they're trying to damage and scar little boys at a crucial stage of development. Little wonder feminists insist on dominating elementary teaching.
Very nice.
Feminists just don't "get" the fact that masculinity is a hard-coded state of affairs driven by evolutionary biology and hormones, just like femininity. We're not women trapped in male bodies, no matter how much they wish us to be, and they can't make us that way no matter how they try, no matter how many of us they throw in prison. Without masculinity, society is doomed.
We're men. Women need us, too. That's life. Deal with it.
And keep your fucking hands off our sons.
Feminism is an anachronism, doomed to extinction. I believe this is finally starting to sink in, which is why we hear more and more stories of feminist-influenced men and women trying to criminalize male sexuality at younger and younger ages on some hopelessly flimsy pretext. Feminists assert that girls mature sooner, yet they're busy demanding that boys be held accountable for their actions at younger and younger ages. Feminists claim that female circumcision is mutilation, intended to repress female sexuality. Yet the feminist-dominated media is busy printing and broadcasting patently ridiculous stories of how beneficial it is to mutilate infant boys, a medically useless (and possibly harmful) procedure which is also about repressing sexuality. As a side-note: the study claiming that involuntary circumcision perfomed on infant boys, generally without the benefit of anesthesia, prevents (insert random number here)% of AIDS cases is badly flawed from a scientific perspective, but this hasn't stopped the feminist hue and cry to mutilate every male baby before it's all the way out of the womb. Has anyone else noticed that nobody's even considering which parts of the female genitals we should be mutilating in infancy, without anesthetic, to stop AIDS and "save lives". Of course not. If we mutilate little boys, it's to "save women's lives". If we mutilate little girls, it's to "repress sexuality".
Cognitive dissonance this ain't.
mcc99, there are marked similarities between radical feminism and other totalitarian political movements. Consider this: a despotic, totalitarian regime doesn't need torture chambers, secret police and hidden prisons when it's healthy. It needs them when it's failing.
From the evidence at hand, we can conclude that feminism is failing, and quickly.