Mother Of Boy Who Had Sex With Teacher Sues

$250,000 is way too little.
If the child was damaged, it is needs to reflect that damage for a lifetime.

Suit should be $3-5 Million based on what the child will likely lose over the course of his life.

How many jobs will he lose because of this damage?
How many relationships will be destroyed before they can even be started?

oregon dad

Once again we see they news media's bias against all things male. They make the ugly truth about the rape or sexual assault look like a consensual relationship, that unfortunately was underage. Likewise, what was the female teacher's history that the board of ed. should have checked on? I wonder if the board has a stricter policy for males than females in checking background?

What a pitiful excuse for a news story. Call it gender feminist propaganda, not willing to say anything bad about a female that hurts a male.

Female Perpetrator/Male Victim

"The mother of a boy who had a sexual relationship with a teacher at Kent County High School is suing the teacher and the county Board of Education."

Male Perpetrator/Female Victim

"The mother of a girl who was raped by a teacher at Kent County High School is suing the teacher and the county Board of Education."

To add insult to injury, she received a suspended sentence and no mention is made of her being placed on a sex offenders list?

Men's activists are rapidly becoming very savvy about how the mainstream media uses language to "spin" and co-opt men's issues.

This is a revered feminist tactic -- using clever language to DEFINE THE TERMS OF DISCOURSE. (What is said and how it is said also edits out alternative ways of describing events and issues.)

It's not unlike the current very public debate over whether the Iraq quagmire (see what I just did?) is defined as an "insurgency" or as a "civil war."

Feminists long ago understood that by appropriating language, they could immediately place men on the defensive.

Words like patriarchy, oppressor, batterer, abuser, deadbeat dad, privileged, sexist, misogynist, etc.

All of these are tools for the language wars that fuel the Gender War to feminism's advantage.

Journalists as a "profession" are thoroughly indoctrinated in feminist and multi-cultural ideologies.

You cannot graduate from our nation's top journalism schools wihout getting the full leftist canon, steeped in women's studies.

The very same elite universities that have all adopted "speech codes" ...

see -- www.thefire.org.

They track violations of freedom of speech at colleges nationwide.

I would be happy seeing all of the inflammatory language stripped out reporting of all of these cases - and pretty much crime reporting in general - regardless of gender.

Sure it sell papers and draws ratings for newscasts but it really does not serve any useful purpose. Stirs up fear and anger is all. We have more then enough of that already if you ask me.

The facts of most cases usually have very little if anything to do with what is reported anyway. Of course if people just reported the facts then it would get boring and ratings and subscriptions would go down.

There ya go.
That is a fact, based on the law.

oregon dad