UN Violence Report Laced with Myths and Misandry

The UN promotes misandry like no other organization on a global scale. This is par for the course for them.

Every major “human” rights organization is a feminist organization.

http://hottopictalk.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=236

http://hottopictalk.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=228

I would really like to expose this. They all place men on the bottom of the human pile.

When men are treated with the same concern and regard as women children and dogs we will have a equal society.

Just the other day a feminist told me:

"A feminist is a person who subscribes to the radical notion that women are human beings".

I replied:

"A men's rights activist is someone who subscribes to the radical notion that both men and women are human beings."

For once, a feminist was silent.

As for feminism itself:

History teaches us that the worst tyrants are those who were formerly oppressed. Feminism teaches us that it is entirely irrevlevant whether that oppression actually took place.

As for the UN:

Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach, govern.

Feminism is the basest sort of hate and greed. It knows no bounds, it is completely insatiable, and it will not stop until men are stripped of all civil and human rights or completely removed from society. The only logical campaign to counter such a movement is one of equal destructive power. Given our innate strengths and competitive instincts, it is inevitable that men will eventually control our own destinies, as it has been since the dawn of our species. This little "blip" on history's logs will soon pass, gentlemen, but unlike feminists, I see a future where we treat members of the opposite sex as equals.

To that end, write your politicians and demand:

1) Scholarships and preferential admissions to higher education for men, since we are underrepresented there. Once men and women are represented in proportion to their numbers in the population, admissions quotas should be established to ensure that the students admitted reflect the population.

2) Presumtive sole custody for fathers in divorce cases. We are demonstrably less violent, more stable and more likely to provide a solid home for our children.

3) An end to abortion and female-controlled birth control. Through their violence (which is greater than men's in all relationships), their treatment of children as objects and their inevitable manipulations of the legal system to receive light or suspended sentences when they behave badly, women have demonstrated their complete irresponsibility with human life, and have no business controlling it without the input of the man who assisted in its creation. In the interests of equality, if men cannot control paternity, women should not be allowed to control maternity, other than through the same destructive and primitive means available to men. When adequate, safe, reversible, non-destructive and accessible birth control is available for men, then and only then should women be allowed access to the same treatments.

4) Preferential hiring of men in all levels of government, given the vast over-representation of women in all civil service positions, followed by a hiring quota which precisely reflects the proportion of men and women in society.

5) Preferential hiring of men as teachers at all levels of education, given the grotesquely sexist imbalance of the genders in that profession. Once the number of male teachers is proportional to the number of men in society, quotas should be used to ensure this sexist imbalance does not occur again.

6) A females-only draft policy until the number of women who have shed blood and died in the name of preserving our way of life equals the historical (and therefore population-adjusted) contribution of men. Once that goal of equality has been reached, draft quotas should be set to reflect the proportion of men and women in society.

7) Preferential funding of all health care programs to reflect the needs and contributions of men to the government's coffers. This funding should be at least double what is allocated to "women's health" issues, not only because of the rampant overfunding of such issues to date, but because without the overwhelming majority of tax dollars that originate from men, there would be no health care to speak of. It's a question of sustainability, as much as fairness. This preferential funding should persist until life expectancies or the balance of the sexes in populations are roughly equalized, at which point funding should be restored to a level which reflects the proportion of men and women in society.

8) An immediate reduction in the retirement age for men (i.e. the age at which old-age pensions become available) by a number of years equal to the difference in life expectancy between the sexes, and another reduction for the greater contribution of men through the duration of their careers. Female doctors, for instance, work only 63% of the hours their male counterparts do. Therefore, they should be entitled to retire 37% earlier, in addition to the 7-year adjustment for the difference in life expectancy. Men are not slaves.

9) An immediate pardon and compensation for any man who has served one instant longer in prison for a crime than a woman who has committed a similar crime.

10) Imprisonment and indebted servitude for all women who fail to provide adequately for their children, whether or not they are able to access those children.

11) Immediate funding for male-only domestic violence, family court and other social services, at the direct expense of funding for female-only programs and services. Once the quantity and quality of services, shelters and protections available to men are equal to those available to women, funding should be restored to a level which reflects the proportion of men and women in society.

All of these changes would result in "equality". Unlike feminism and the UN's worldview, they are based on its definition.

If I can raise the money, I will run for office on these points, among others. Now if you'll excuse me, I have some letters to mail.

I can feel the heat of your words emanating from my computer screen. But think..do you really want 50% of our combat forces to be Jessica Lynch's??? Good God, Hezbollah alone could defeat us!!

(and by the way, those who can't do, teach, manage or govern become psychotherapists).
-Axolotl

do you really want 50% of our combat forces to be Jessica Lynch's??? Good God, Hezbollah alone could defeat us!!

No, as I said, I want 100% of our combat forces to be female until a number of females equal to the number of men who have died doing that same job have died and been maimed. Hezbollah doesn't have a navy, ICBMs or an air force, so I think we're probably safe over on this side of the pond.

The problem with Jessica Lynch wasn't an inability to fight. It was the fact that the whole damned military had to drop what it was doing and save her from a hospital where the "enemy" was providing her health care and watching over her. THAT'S why I want women in the military in large numbers - so that like Isreal and other equal-opportunity-draft nations, we learn that they are no more valuable than the men on the battlefield and at home.

I'm told that women are my equal.

I couldn't agree more.

Now let them pay the same price for their rights and liberties that we do.

Deleted

To many of the MRAs on this board seem to want to maintain the status quo except in an area that directly affects them.

To many of the men on this board still think of women as more valuable human beings then themselves.

But in order to achieve many of your goals you'd first need to completely ditch many laws that are extremely biased against men and start from scratch with new gender neutral laws that do not assign victim and perpetrator status based on gender.

You'll never get more male teachers, doctors, social workers, child care workers, ect. with the current laws that make these extremely risky fields for men to get involved in. In order to get men back into any fields like those you would first need to get rid of the constant threat that hangs over mens heads of loosing everything because some one does not like them and told a little white lie about them. There is even greater risks in the workplace for many men then in marrage. If your married you only have to worry abou your wife taking away everything you own. If you are a teacher, you need to be worried about every single child you teach. Got to put some safe guards in place to protect men if you want them back in teaching an other like profesions.

I actually scanned the 140-page report, mostly the table of contents, and the Conclusions. (Thankfully the last 40 pages are citations and footnotes to other feminist "research" articles & reports.)

I've not yet decided if I have the stamina (and the right pain medication) to actually read the whole screed.

But I have not seen such a fantastic example of Marxist-grammar since, well, graduate school!

This is the true language of those seeking a powerful universal world government.

They want to end the concept of the "private life" and replace it with a surveillance society.

Ironically, our Congress achieved that just last week when it revoked the individual's legal Constitutional right to habeas corpus.

I've always felt that feminism is a side show, a shill and a distraction, deflecting attention away from the real tyrants' cleverly disguised permanent corporate war plans ...

A couple favorites from the Conclusions of the U.N. Report --

369. There is a significant and unacceptable gap between the international standards on violence against women and the concrete commitment of political capital and
resources to implement these standards. The specificities of the State’s obligations
need to be clarified in the diverse contexts in which violence against women occurs. Varying circumstances and constraints allow for different actions to be taken by individual States, but do not excuse State inaction.

366. While violence against women is universal and present in every society and
culture, it takes different forms and is experienced differently. The forms of violence to which women are subjected and the ways in which they experience this violence are often shaped by the intersection of gender with other factors such as race, ethnicity, class, age, sexual orientation, disability, nationality, legal status, religion and culture. Therefore diverse strategies that take these intersecting factors into account are required in order to eradicate violence against all women.

Deleted