California may mandate a woman in the boardroom, but businesses are fighting it
Article here. Excerpt:
'California is moving toward becoming the first state to require companies to have women on their boards –assuming the idea could survive a likely court challenge.
Sparked by debates around fair pay, sexual harassment and workplace culture, two female state senators are spearheading a bill to promote greater gender representation in corporate decision-making. Of the 445 publicly traded companies in California, a quarter of them lack a single woman in their boardrooms.
SB 826, which won Senate approval with only Democratic votes and has until the end of August to clear the Assembly, would require publicly held companies headquartered in California to have at least one woman on their boards of directors by end of next year. By 2021, companies with boards of five directors must have at least two women, and companies with six-member boards must have at least three women. Firms failing to comply would face a fine.
...
Yet critics of the bill say it violates the federal and state constitutions. Business associations say the rule would require companies to discriminate against men wanting to serve on boards, as well as conflict with corporate law that says the internal affairs of a corporation should be governed by the state law in which it is incorporated. This bill would apply to companies headquartered in California.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
In further news...
... the CA Assembly has passed a law requiring all nursing shifts staffed by 8 or more nurses to have at least 2 male nurses on shift. Further, the law requires hospitals to pay WHATEVER is necessary to get those 2 guys on staff. Sky's the limit. Competence is irrelevant.
Question
Wouldn't such a law be illegal due to the Unruh Civil Rights Act? Or does that just state that businesses can't discriminate when it comes to providing services to customers based on gender?