Uber for women is a great idea—except for one thing

Article here. Excerpt:

'A new women-only ride-sharing service, Chariot for Women, is set to launch April 19 in Boston, Massachusetts.

Surprisingly, its founder is not a former female passenger who felt unsafe in an Uber—as many of us have—but Michael Pelletz, an Uber driver who had a revelation when he felt threatened by a passenger.

“What if I was a woman?” Pelletz, wrote on the company’s website. In fact, worries about safety are why his wife Kelly—who is now Chariot for Women’s president—decided not to drive for Uber, he said.

Scores of women have reported rapes and assaults by Uber drivers, while, anecdotally, countless others have felt threatened. In March, Uber’s safety issues were thrown into the spotlight when Uber driver Jason Brian Dalton allegedly shot and killed six people in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Dalton continued to pick up Uber passengers in between his shooting rampages. Just yesterday, Uber agreed to pay up to $25 million to settle with prosecutors for misleading passengers about the thoroughness of its background checks.
...
That all sounds great. But “whether it’s legal or not is a different question,” Joseph L. Sulman, an employment law specialist, told the Boston Globe. According to civil rights lawyers, Chariots for Women’s female-only policies could put it squarely in the crosshairs of gender discrimination lawsuits, which would be difficult to win.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

There's reported, then there's actual. How many of such reported assaults are actually validated upon investigation, assuming there are any?

It'd be easy money, a lawsuit without a trial. Get settlement, go to bank. Some people in life feel for whatever reason they have nothing to lose and don't care about right and wrong. This reality is also non-discriminatory. Gender isn't a factor when assessing moral uprightness.

Like0 Dislike0