Jackie’s rape story was false so why hasn’t the media named her by now?
Article here. Excerpt:
'In the 14 months since her story shocked the world, Jackie has been at the heart of a national debate about sexual assaults on college campuses, has become embroiled in a media scandal, and is the central figure in a series of defamation lawsuits.
Yet there’s one important fact missing about Jackie, the young woman who concocted a harrowing story about a gang rape at a University of Virginia fraternity: her full name.
News organizations have declined to reveal Jackie’s full identity since her now-discredited story appeared in Rolling Stone magazine in November 2014. Her single-name identity — just Jackie — is in keeping with a long-standing journalistic convention against identifying alleged victims of sexual crimes to protect the accuser’s privacy.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
Her name is Jackie Coakley
http://gotnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/UVA-Jackie-Coakley.jpg
http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/10/national-organization-for-women-defends-rolling-stone-gang-rape-fabricator/
http://gotnews.com/tag/jackie-coakley/
There, mystery solved.
Why..?
"Jackie’s rape story was false so why hasn’t the media named her by now?"
Rhetorical question, right?
Doing the Media's job, for it.
It's a sad state of affairs when we, the public, have to do the Media's job, for it, wouldn't you say?