
Why ‘Manspreading’ Is Definitely a Serious Issue, as Explained by the Feminist Internet
Article here. Excerpt:
You might not think that it’s appropriate for the government to launch a campaign telling men how to sit on the subway. Well guess what? You’re wrong.
If you “manspread” on the subway (which, by the way, means to sit with your legs apart, in case you are a fixture of the patriarchy who doesn’t educate himself on important women’s issues), you are doing so much more than taking up space.
Here’s what’s really going on with manspreading, as explained by some of the bright, forward-thinking minds on the Feminist Internet:
1. Manspreading is saying, “Who gives a f*** if you can’t sit, [we] are men. See [our] balls.”
This is as explained by a man, Mychal Denzel Smith, for the blog Feministing. (Finally a man courageous enough to cue the rest of the world in to the secret language of the subway brotherhood!)
2. Manspreading is “an assertion of male dominance,” and “every one” of the manspreaders does it because he feels like he has to “claim [his] territory and [his] manhood in this public space, even at the discomfort of all the other passengers.”
Another great point by Smith. Who, by the way, also wrote: “When I stand, I sometimes cross my legs.” Sexy, sexy, sexy! Amirite ladies?!'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
It's amazing
That stuff like this gets published.
The article does make clear the purpose of the campaign: to bash men.
LOL
I wonder if Mychal and his ilk realize that all they're accomplishing is being fine examples of Poe's Law.
Poe's Law: Extreme Parody is very similar to actual extremism.