![Subscribe to Syndicate](https://news.mensactivism.org/misc/feed.png)
Salon: For white working-class women, it makes sense to stay single mothers
Article here. Excerpt:
'Lily had grown up in a rural town, more than an hour from Kansas City, Mo. She was four months pregnant and not feeling well, and she was in tears. She was also not married, but that’s not what was upsetting her. The car that she needed to get to her two jobs in the city had broken down, and she had no other way to get to work. We asked whether her boyfriend, Carl, could help her. Lily frowned. She had recently broken up with Carl, she explained, because “I can support myself. I always have. I can support myself and our kid. I just can’t support myself, the kid, and him.”
...
A generation ago her decision would have seemed narrow, misguided, and difficult to understand. But now we have to conclude that it makes a lot of sense. Although it defies logic, socioeconomic, cultural, and economic changes have brought white working-class women like Lily to the point where going it alone can be the wiser choice. And the final irony: The same changes that have made marriages more equitable and successful among elite couples have made it less likely that marriage will look attractive to Lily.
When Lily looks around at the available men, they don’t offer what she is looking. Lily, just like better-off men and women, believes that marriage means an unqualified commitment to the other spouse. When you marry someone, you support him in hard times. You stick with him when he disappoints you. You visit him if he ends up in jail. And you encourage him to become an important part of your children’s lives. It’s just that Lily doesn’t believe that Carl is worth that commitment. Nor does she believe that she will meet someone who will meet her standards anytime soon, and the statistics back her up.
The economy has changed. A higher percentage of men today than 50 years ago have trouble finding steady employment, securing raises and promotions, or remaining sober and productive. Blue-collar men like Carl have lost ground while more highly educated men have gained. The unemployment rate for all men ages 20–24 is almost 13 percent, and those with only a high school education are more than twice as likely to be unemployed as those with a college degree. Moreover, many of the jobs that are available have become less reliable than they were for Carl’s dad. They don’t pay as well, last as long, or offer promotions or training. Carl has quit more than one job because he got fed up with his boss. More recently, he was laid off because construction work dried up during a particularly cold spell during the winter. After the layoff, he hung around with his friends, drinking and playing video games. Lily finally had enough when she found out that Carl had run up several hundred dollars in expenses on her credit card. Lily knows she will never be able to depend on him and, particularly now that she has a child, she doesn’t believe she can afford the risk. It is not surprising that marriage rates for men in the bottom quartile of earnings have fallen dramatically, from 86 percent in 1970 to 50 percent today.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
And for working-class men...
... it makes sense to never get married much less have kids. In fact, esp. where having kids goes, it makes sense for any man in any country that has the same kind of bonkers matrimonial and child custody laws and precedents that the US does to refrain from that.
Carl is no fool, except perhaps in that he wasn't properly condomed (or accurately informed by Lily re her use-of-birth-control status). And why is Lily in the state she is in, perhaps reasonably concluding staying single and trying to keep Carl at arm's length? Do I really need to answer that question?
Where's the personal
Where's the personal accountability? Lily has made some bad choices and is now relying on other people. She is not so independent as the author tries to imply at first (only in the end does it mention that she relies on her parents and implies that she recieves welfare)
I am having a hard time buying the story. We are asked to believe that a single pregnant woman is emotionally and financially able to care for her baby, while the author simoutnaiously mentions that Lily is crying because she cannot afford the car repairs she needs to get her to work which is an hours drive into the city.
I put more blame on women for these situations. Women are the gatekeeper to sex and pregnancy.
Also a child deserves an accurate birth certificate with his or her father's name, and a father should not have to fight for parental rights to his child just because he is not married to the mother. Imagine if the tables were turned and Lily could not assume full costody plus welfare after the birth, and if more were done to give the father custody and help.
I think the whole sceanrio of this story spinning Lily and women like her as good and strong and men as childish, cheating loosers is feminist fiction. These stiuations arise because feminist promote sexual freedom with no accountability. If only women chose better partners.....