'Who belongs in the delivery room?'

Article here. Excerpt:

'Should a father be allowed in the delivery room for the birth of his child, over the mother's objections? A New Jersey judge said no last November, in a ruling that was released in writing earlier this week. "Any interest a father has before the child's birth is subordinate to the mother's interest," Judge Sohail Mohammed wrote. That has to be the right call. At the same time, I can understand why fathers' rights groups see the ruling as discrimination: It privileges motherhood over fatherhood.
....
The same logic of biology convinced me that a New York judge was wrong last year when she barred Sara McKenna, a former Marine and firefighter, from moving from California to New York, because she wanted to go to Columbia University, when she was seven months pregnant. The father of McKenna's child was the Olympic skier Bode Miller, and he tried to block her from moving across the country by asserting his paternal rights before his child was born. An appeals court quickly reversed that order. Again, fathers just cannot have rights over fetuses that interfere with a woman's freedom of choice and movement in this way. Once the child is born, the law can accord equal rights to fathers and mothers. Before birth, it just cannot.

I recognize the pathos and irony here in turning fathers away. To resolve the dispute between Plotnick and DeLuccia, Mohammed turned to New Jersey's parentage act, which he pointed out was designed "to help families deal with the problems posed by fathers who seek to avoid paying child support." In other words, deadbeat dads. Steven Plotnick has been anything but that, and with any luck his child's life — and maybe DeLuccia's, too — will be the better for it. But the impulse to want what's best for his child could have led Plotnick to give DeLuccia her space rather than (figuratively) pounding on her delivery room door. As Mohammed pointed out, New Jersey and federal law also protect DeLuccia's privacy rights as a patient. And he rightly notes that dealing with Plotnick's uninvited presence could "add to an already stressful situation" in a way that "could endanger both the mother and the fetus." Surely Plotnick would agree that the baby's health is paramount here.
...
Plotnick's lawyer now says that her client "never asked to be in the delivery room, only to be able to see the baby at the hospital as soon as possible after the birth," according to the Newark Star-Ledger. If that's all Plotnick had asked for in court, I'd sympathize. Though then it would be hard to see what he had to sue over, since DeLuccia said she would put him on the visitor's list. Maybe he thought he couldn't get that concession without the suit. Or maybe he just got carried away in a tide of paternal desires. But being a good father when your child is still in utero means thinking about his or her mother's well-being, too. When men can have babies, then they can decide who comes into the delivery room. Until then, the limits of biology limit their rights.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

IMJ, this has to do with the hospital's right to control access to operational venues (which they must have) and the patient to control what non-essential people are present from a medical perspective. This is why when a parade of 3rd-yr. med students arrives at your door, the MD asks if it's OK for them to look at whatever needs looking at along with them. You can decline the request (I never have; I want fledgling doctors to have all the clinical exposure they can get before hanging out that shingle!).

So really, to me, while it seems like a fathers' rights issue on the surface, it really isn't; it's a "bigger picture" thing at work. However the author of this article is decidedly not sympathetic with the plight of fathers and she makes it pretty clear. She sounds a lot to me like she would be fine with the it's-her-choice-but-it's-his-responsibility line of "reasoning" feminists are so fond of when it comes to such things as child support, etc. (In fact, Wikipedia discusses her views on abortion here and big surprise, she's related, albeit tangentially, to Betty Friedan. So while I am speculating on her attitudes toward fathers' obligations in the face of no post-conceptive choices, I have a feeling I'm right. But admittedly, without asking her, I can't be sure.)

With judges ruling like this, all I can say is: Be real careful who you have kids with, whether you're a man or woman. Reeeeaaallll caaaarrreeffuuuulll....

Like0 Dislike0