Do no harm: Who should bear the costs of retired NFL players’ medical bills?

Article here. Excerpt:

'After 24 knee operations, the National Football League’s former Man of the Year leans heavily on a crutch. When Reggie Williams pulls up his pants leg, what’s underneath looks like the trimmings from a butcher shop. His right leg is so ravaged that it’s three inches shorter than his left. Worse, it’s uninsured.
...
But now, Williams and his battered legs amount to a bill no one wants to pay. Since 2005 Williams, 58, has suffered a cascade of health problems he says stem from his 14-year football career, including multiple knee replacements and a bone infection, which he estimates have cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars out of pocket.
...
Critics say the NFL’s medical benefits don’t adequately address the full range of these problems. The NFL’s health insurance lasts five years after retirement — players who lasted fewer than three seasons don’t qualify for it at all — but the most serious health consequences of a football career often don’t manifest for a decade or more.
...
"First and foremost, the NFL is in the hurt business,” said Mel Owens, a former NFL player who is now a California attorney and represents Williams. “In workers’ comp they will end up paying for the players’ brains, hearts and livers, as well as orthopedic injuries, and it’s expensive. But they don’t want to pay at all.”'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Pretend football was played by women to the degree it is by men. There are in fact female football teams. They get a lot less attn than men's teams, probably for the same reason women's basketball doesn't get the same attention as men's.

But pretend women played football as much as men do. Now imagine they get the same injuries while playing in essence as an employee of a football franchise. Does anyone think there would not be widespread demands for compensating them?

Like0 Dislike0