data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9178a/9178a8080e440b5b3c2780b00fc44bc146d81143" alt="Subscribe to Syndicate"
Man sues women-only gym over text messages
Story here. Excerpt:
'The women-only Lucille Roberts health club cluelessly peppered Alex Shiyan with text messages about a sweetheart membership deal.
Just one problem — he’s a man.
The Brooklyn resident became so fed up with the useless offer that he fired back at the fitness giant with a class-action lawsuit filed yesterday in Manhattan federal court.
“1 Day Sale @ Lucille Roberts. just $5 to register and $15 a month NO CONTRACT,” read the message, according to the suit.
It also urged him to call the franchise operation’s Irvington, NJ, branch, adding, “Ask for Jessica and get a free gift when you join today!”
...
Shiyan’s proposed class-action complaint seeks damages of up to $2,000 “for each and every text” received by him and potentially “thousands” of others, along with a court order barring Lucille Roberts from sending out future unsolicited spam directly to people’s smartphones.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
OK but not quite the idea
The issue of spam texts is one thing, and sure, he may have a case of harassment-by-text here. But the real issue is the "women-only" thing. It may be lawful to have single-sex paid-membership clubs of all kinds, but when the purpose of the club or accommodation is not inherently gender-specific, then it's a problem. That is after all why other dues-paying membership clubs have been successfully sued to admit women, right? So why's it not just as good the other way around? Guess you all know the answer already.