Many Women Victims of 'Contraceptive Sabotage,' Experts Say

Submitted by Minuteman on Fri, 2013-01-25 02:03

Link here. Excerpt:

'Obstetricians and gynecologists should screen women and teens for signs that their partner is sabotaging their birth control, forcing them to have unprotected sex or otherwise trying to control their reproductive choices, says a leading group of U.S. doctors.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) lays out guidelines for detecting sexual and reproductive "coercion" -- which it calls an under-recognized form of violence against women -- in the February issue of the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology.

"Most ob/gyns are probably unfamiliar with sexual and reproductive coercion as an entity and probably don't ask about it," said Dr. Eve Espey, chairwoman of the ACOG's Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women.

The abuse includes hiding or destroying a woman's birth control method of choice; poking holes in a condom or removing it during sex; coercing a woman to carry out or end a pregnancy against her will through violence or threats; and intentionally exposing her to a sexually transmitted disease.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

... impregnate their gfs/wives/random hook-up partners in a wicked, diabolical plot. It's a coordinated, nation-wide, evil patriarchal conspiracy. This is because men LOVE paying child support and most especially just LOVE the relationship drama associated with pregnancies their sex partners weren't planning for. But mostly, men derive great satisfaction from having angry, upset women screaming at them about how hard their lives have now become and IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT!!

Yeah.

I wonder when doctors will start counselling young men on the importance of keeping a lookout for signs their sex partners are trying to get pregnant while keeping up the appearance that they're still on the pill or using the ring.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Fri, 2013-01-25 04:51

The idea of Reproductive Coercion was coined by some researchers a few years ago who did a very suspect study on this idea. One thing that most don't know is that the study only asked the women if they had been victims of reproductive coercion, never asked if they were perps of the same. Nor did it even bother to ask the men any questions at all, pro or con. It was a set up to get the data they wanted. At least that is the way I see it. Much like the DV "research."

I wrote a blog post about this original study some time ago and it shows the shenanigans of this group pretty clearly including my interaction with the lead researcher via email. You can see the post here:

http://menaregood.com/wordpress/reproductive-coercion-and-research-omissions/

Tom

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Tom on Fri, 2013-01-25 16:06

I suspect people are starting to see daddy by deception type stories as a real problem, and this is just a feminist effort to try to deflect and spin the issue back onto women. As much as I've seen feminist opposition to legal parental surrender, I've seen a lot of support for it from the average person... and feminists don't like that.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Kratch on Fri, 2013-01-25 18:17

my experience with women was exactly opposite of this, where the woman intentionally selected males with jobs and then went to bed with them while ovulating. guess what happened? you are correct sir! she "got pregnant" (in a VERY premeditated way) and ends up duping the stupid male for 18+ years of child support.

I did some research and determined that she did exactly the same thing to the next guy also. Thats right. Two kids in a row by two different unsuspecting men, all sanctioned and rewared by the state.

Well, during a hearing with the state it was revealed that her monthly mortgage was EXACTLY the sum of both of those child support awards. She gets two kids and a FREE house!

this is what feminism is. disregard this article and read what I have written. It doesn't get any weirder than that....

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by oregon dad on Sat, 2013-01-26 02:54