
40 years after Title IX, women still lag in tech fields
Article here. Excerpt:
'On the academic side, women earn the majority of degrees at the associate's, bachelor's, master's and doctoral levels.
Yet their numbers lag in what are known as the STEM fields — science, technology, engineering and math. Education Department data show, for example, that just 17% of engineering and 18% of computer science-related bachelor's degrees in 2009-10 were awarded to women. Women make up 25% of the STEM workforce.
Several conference participants, including Education Secretary Arne Duncan and King, stressed the economic imperative for encouraging more girls to pursue careers in STEM fields.
...
Sabrina Schaeffer, executive director of the non-profit Independent Women's Forum, which is critical of Title IX, said efforts to level the STEM playing field could have the opposite effect: "If we don't have enough women in engineering, are the schools going to cut engineering programs?" said Schaeffer, who spoke Wednesday at a separate Title IX event in Washington. "We have to recognize that men and women are different and are going to make different choices."'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
I find it interesting
that women complain about not making as much money as men but avoid the STEM fields like the plague. We've never needed a program to convince men to study the STEM fields. Why do we need one for women?
How about conscription as a solution? :-)
[tongue in cheek mode = on]
If women won't go into STEM, why not pick the brightest women and force them into STEM fields. Throw a penalty in there -- 5 years in prison and a $250,000.00 fine if they refuse to sign up for this system.
If conscription is good for men, it'll be good enough for women too!
[tongue in cheek mode = off]
Seriously though, women should register for selective service at 18, just like men. And the physical fitness requirements for entering the military should be unitary -- no more separate standards for men and women.