A Voice for Men: "Welcome New York Times Readers"

Article here. Excerpt:

'If you came here after seeing A Voice for Men mentioned in the New York Times, welcome. You were led here after reading the following:

“Lurking around the edges of the male studies movement, moreover, in Web[sic] sites like Paul Elam’s A Voice for Men, is a certain amount of anti-feminist hostility, if not outright misogyny,” or so says Times writer Charles McGrath.

Please allow me to take a brief moment to demonstrate how fallacious this statement is, and why.

First, and it seems silly to have to say this, we are not “lurkers” here, though I give McGrath due credit for creativity with dark metaphors. Very compelling.

I support the concept of male studies, and I have been personally enthused about the efforts of the Male Studies Foundation since my days as Editor-in-Chief at mensnewsdaily.com. I have no official relationship with The Foundation and am much more concerned with an array of issues other than Male Studies.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Hats off to you Paul. You've evidently struck a nerve at the NYT. You're worrying the editors at the NYT, and they want to put down what you're doing. The NYT article is such a smear campaign, and quite obviously so. Anybody with have a sense for lies can tell this right away.

I hope this article in the NYT, and your article responding to it, brings plenty of manginas into the men's movement, men who are still reading the NYT. Personally, I haven't read the NYT for over a decade, because it's such an obviously feminist newspaper. I can't imagine any self-respecting man, who actually has a clue about feminism, would read it these days.

Like0 Dislike0

This is a milestone for the MRA movement. NYT's insult should be viewed as a major "coming of age" step in our journey.

Congratulations Paul - we have liftoff!

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
- Mahatma Ghandi,

Like0 Dislike0