Barbara Kay: How patriarchy ran into its own iceberg

Article here. Excerpt:

'The Titanic sank in 1912 after hitting an iceberg. Of the 2,200 people on board, 1,517 died. The Lusitania sank in 1915, victim to a German U-boat torpedo. Of the nearly 2,000 people on board, 1,200 died. In addition to carrying about the same numbers of passengers, the demographic composition of the two ships - adults, children, men, women, old, young - was also similar.
...
According to a new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the altruism of the Titanic and the length of time it took for the ship to sink are causally linked. Benno Torgler, study author and economics professor at Queensland University of Technology in Australia explains that circumstances dictate levels of altruism. According to the study, since the Titanic passengers had a few hours to consider their options, "there was time for socially determined behavioural patterns to re-emerge."
...
Yes, women were infantilized in many ways in the patriarchy, which a cynic might say was the driving impulse behind the chivalry of the Titanic's men. But so what? At the moment when it mattered most, the notion that men should above all act as protectors of the vulnerable in times of danger to all committed them to death in the service of others. Was there ever a more noble or selfless act?

The study reminds us that the heroism of the Titanic was a willed phenomenon, and one that feminists do not wish to discuss (I have tried).

Instead of fetishizing the victimhood of women at men's hands and the deviance from our cultural norm that Marc Lepine represented with man-bashing dirges across the land every December 6, would it not make more sense - and would it not be more ethically fitting and socially unifying - to celebrate the more representative manliness of men every April 15, the date of the Titanic's sinking? Still six weeks left to plan it.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

We mourn the loss of life on that ship (or should we not be asking why the lives of those on a ship sunk decades ago are any more or less worthy of mourning than the many others lost daily to tragedies of all kinds) and, vis-a-vis men, instead of celebrating the self-sacrifice thereof, strive to find a way to view the lives of anyone and everyone in those circumstances equally?

How about that?

I have been in MRA work a long time and this discussion of the Titanic comes up again and again. I don't know why. Daily there are plenty of similar examples of men sacrificing themselves for women and children, on ships and not, that ought to be getting more immediate attention if for no other reason than we may actually be able to do something about these situations. As for the Titanic, it's been sunk now for a very long time and makes an example that is unlikely to connect with anyone alive today who is in the greatest danger of dying for women and children with little acknowledgment or appreciation for their sacrifice: 20-something-YO men.

Like0 Dislike0