Feminist objections to stimulus content lead to strange funding priorities

Article here. Excerpt:

'...feminist leaders complained that rebuilding roads and bridges would employ working-class men, who have borne the brunt of the recession, rather than women or the “sexually diverse.” Unemployment is very high among transportation and construction workers, who are overwhelmingly male. The vast majority of people who have lost their jobs in the current recession are male — 82%. But the stimulus package is not aimed at helping them. In response to demands from feminist leaders, the Obama Administration rewrote the stimulus package to largely exclude them, as Christina Hoff Sommers has chronicled at length.

The Obama Administration purged the stimulus package of most of the investments in roads and bridges originally suggested by economists, and filled it instead with welfare and social spending, out of political correctness, after feminist leaders complained that building and repairing roads and bridges would put unemployed blue-collar men to work, rather than women.
...
Recently, Obama fired an inspector general, Gerald Walpin, who uncovered millions of dollars of waste and fraud in the AmeriCorps program, including by a prominent Obama supporter, endangering the Obama supporter’s ability to administer federal stimulus spending in Sacramento.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

First piece of evidence i think of when some feminist says feminism doesn't hurt men is this attack on the stimulus package (im surprised they don't object to the term "package").

Like0 Dislike0

i saw a t-shirt the other day that says something like

"somewhere in xxxx, africa they are missing their village idiot".

i concur.

Like0 Dislike0