UK: 'Why Harriet Harman is right to call for more women in power'

Article here. Excerpt:

'If Harriet Harman will have achieved anything during her two-week stint in charge of the government, it will be this: she has already increased women's visibility in politics. Her own, especially. There she was at the weekend, on the front page of the Sunday Times, in a news story with the screaming headline "You can't trust men in power". And then again, yesterday, on the cover of London's Evening Standard, beneath the no less incendiary header "Woman running Britain says . . . banks crisis is down to men".

All of which could lead innocent souls to believe that Harman has spent the fortnight going after the patriarchy with all guns – or should I say, all bras – blazing. And she has still got a few days to go. Hurrah! The reality is slightly more muted. At no point in her Sunday Times interview did Harman actually say that she didn't trust men. Instead, she suggested that "men cannot be left to run things on their own . . . In a country where women regard themselves as equal, they are not prepared to see men just running the show themselves." Seems straightforward. And that tone is echoed in the Standard, where she is quoted saying that "women make up half the workforce of insurance companies and banks. Why shouldn't they have a say on the boards as well?"'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

"women make up half the workforce of insurance companies and banks. Why shouldn't they have a say on the boards as well?"

Because the great majority of people with the skill to do the job are men, that's why. I am assuming of course that she is using a feminist definition of having a say that comes down to at least a third of the board being female - i doubt she would consider 10% having a say, even if 90% of the qualified applicants are males.

Like0 Dislike0

Men are cause of financial collapse? Why is it women mostly convicted of embezzlement?

Let Equality flourish, the chips fall where they may.

Like0 Dislike0