Gender Equity in a Time of Fiscal Restraint

Article here. Excerpt:

'Under prevailing law, which is based on the Brown University case brought by women gymnasts whose team had been eliminated in a university-wide cutback, institutions must "fully accommodate" the interests and abilities of women to participate in intercollegiate sports. It is not simply a matter of eliminating equal numbers of men's and women's teams or even equal numbers of opportunities to participate for each gender. Women's teams simply cannot be eliminated unless a college can prove that females in the student body have their interests in participating fully met. Unless college women suddenly decide that they no longer wish to pursue college athletics, schools will have to save money by cutting only men's teams or finding some other means to balance their budgets. They can always follow the Brandeis University approach of either selling their artwork (which Brandeis ultimately decided not to do) or cutting pension contributions for their loyal employees (which Brandeis decided to do last week).'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

By comparison women's teams do not.
So - which teams are going to get cut? The ones that pay or the ones that don't?

I just saw a news article on the tube last evening about women's pro sports getting hammered right now.
Fact is, they are a luxury. They barely support themselves. They were citing the women's NBA and women's golf as having to endure large cut backs right now in funding from sponsers.

The poor girls.

And we eliminate vast numbers of men's teams just so the girls can play in college.
In the real world, if you are not profitable, you are gone....that is, unless you are GM or AIG....

I suppose the gov't could own women's athletics too.....

oregon dad

Like0 Dislike0

Why is it that the Jim Crow concept of "separate but equal" is considered progressive when applied to athletics?

Like0 Dislike0