data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9178a/9178a8080e440b5b3c2780b00fc44bc146d81143" alt="Subscribe to Syndicate"
Voices from the Grave, Betrayed by a Restraining Order
Article here. Excerpt:
'Debi Olson had three restraining orders taken out against her. But that didn’t stop the woman from ambushing ex-husband Mauricio Droguett in an Iowa shopping mall last July, fatally stabbing him in front of shocked mall-goers.
Toni Brown of Washington, DC was shot by former girlfriend Raina Johnson on August 12, 2008, leaving the woman paralyzed from her neck down. Johnson is currently serving a 28-year sentence for a crime the judge termed “extraordinarily brutal.” A restraining order had been previously issued against the assailant.
Karen Allende of New York City was walking to work on a September day in 2006 when she was attacked suddenly by her husband. She died that morning on the sidewalk, a restraining order folded neatly in her purse.
...
Judge Milton Raphaelson of Massachusetts once opined, “Few lives, if any, have been saved, but much harm, and possibly loss of lives, has come from the issuance of restraining orders and the arrests and conflicts ensuring therefrom.”
Each year, the Violence Against Women Act spends up to $75 million to promote restraining orders. That’s the kind of wasteful federal program that leaves a bad taste in taxpayers’ mouths.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
I saw something a while back
I didn't read the article here so maybe it is mentioned, but I have read in the past that there is good evidence that "restraining orders may actually increase violence". I recall the statement was made in a general sense, not just as a reference to an odd case here or there. Sorry that I can't remember where it was, but it was some reference cited in an article linked on an MR board, possibly ma.org. I saw it 2 or 3 years ago.
-ax