"Mother hit hard in custody case"

Story here. Excerpt:

'A Toronto judge has taken the drastic step of finding a mother of three in contempt of court for flagrantly violating court orders during her relentless campaign to alienate her children from their father.

The woman, known as K.D., lost custody of her daughters in January, but this latest ruling takes the case to a new level, with the 42-year-old chiropodist finding herself on the losing side of a power struggle with the court.

The mother intentionally acted against the best interests of her children by cutting off telephone calls and visits with their father and walking out of counselling sessions, Justice Faye McWatt said in a decision released earlier but withheld from publication until today so K.D., who is self-represented, could read it first.

She has been ordered to pay $35,000 in penalties and legal costs to her ex-husband, 56, a vascular surgeon known as A.L., who was also granted permission to take the girls to a U.S. therapy program designed to undo damage caused by parents who poison children against another parent.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Wouldn't it be great to read that headline one day?

Like0 Dislike0

Matt writes "Wouldn't it be great to read that headline one day?"

Yeah, but that wouldn't be news because:

  • It happens all the time (Too common)
  • Everyone (except in denial radical feminists) knows it
  • There has to be some egregious twist to make it news worthy (like the 105% divorce settlement against the down-on-his-luck London financier we read about recently)
Like0 Dislike0