"Mistresses of the Universe"
Op-ed here. Excerpt:
'Banks around the world desperately want bailouts of billions of dollars, but they also have another need they’re unaware of: women, women and women.
...
Wall Street is one of the most male-dominated bastions in the business world; senior staff meetings resemble a urologist’s waiting room. Aside from issues of fairness, there’s evidence that the result is second-rate decision-making.
...
“We found that a trader’s morning testosterone level predicts his day’s profitability,” reported the study, published last year in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Higher testosterone meant more risk-taking and, usually, more money.
On its own, that might suggest that men have an advantage on the trading floor. Yet the same study also suggested that elevated testosterone levels could lead to greater assumption of risk; high testosterone levels “may shift risk preferences and even affect a trader’s ability to engage in rational choice.” In other words: when male traders crash ... boy, they crash.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
The NYT is printing misandry again?
Wow, there's a shocker. I mean it's not as if they've been known to run a women's health pullout section on Father's Day, or editorialize in favor of "pioneers" that form lesbians-only societies.
With that track record, who would've thought that they'd have an institutional phobia of men?
As for this article, it gets my usual response: either produce statistically valid evidence comparing the long-term performance of female investment professionals to that of male investment professionals or STFU!