UK: Positive Relationships: Boys - Why gender matters

Article here. Excerpt:

'So, what might be going wrong? One of the less edifying aspects of our education system is that it seems to be influenced by ideology rather than what we know about human development. It ignores what the influence of our evolutionary history might be on the structure of our brains and any innate predisposition for learning, which may also be influenced by gender.

The inclination of many boys to be interested in objects that move, movement itself and rigorous exploration and play, can sometimes be interpreted as a 'problem', while perhaps the inclination for girls to sit and talk is seen in a more positive light. Political correctness which, at its extreme, may try to deny physical/physiological/neurological differences between boys and girls, can also work against the very concept of equal opportunities which it is meant to espouse, as it appears to suggest that learning opportunities and learning contexts for boys and girls are almost interchangeable.

Another factor in the issue is that most of the practitioners in the early years and also in primary education tend to be female, and so there may be an unconscious predisposition for a greater 'identification' with the girls than the boys.'

---

Admin note: Free reg'n required to read article.

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

But I can bet dollars to donuts that the one issue not covered in the article or book is the GREAT TABOO: that female teachers, almost universally indoctrinated by women's studies, are DELIBERATELY targeting boys——punishing them disproportionately, marginalizing them in the classroom, overemphasizing feminine standards they know they can't/won't adhere to, deliberately setting them up for failure for ideological reasons. After any kind of exposure to women's studies, if they buy into any of it's tenets, they can't help but see their little boys as patriarchs-in-training.

To suggest that this is in any way conscious is a taboo no MAN can breach.

Like0 Dislike0