Phoenix man receives 848 1/2 years in prison for sex crimes

Story here. Excerpt:

"On Friday, Judge Maria del Mar Verdin handed 18 life sentences, five 20-year sentences, seven 17-year sentences, four 5-year sentences, and nine 1 1/2-year sentences to James Wallace Galloway, 52, said Mike Scerbo, a spokesman for the county attorney's office.

Galloway was convicted on 43 counts relating to the sexual abuse and molestation of minor children, furnishing obscene material to children and public sexual indecency, Scerbo said."

Comments? Would a woman receive this type of dramatic and emotional sentence by a male judge? What are his chances of getting the sentence reduced?

---

Ed. note: The point here is not should he be punished with what is effectively a life sentence-- some may think that is too much, others not enough. The point is this: would a female convict of the same crimes get the same kind of sentence?

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Honestly, I'd bet that a max sentence for a woman in this case would be 5-10 years in prison and lifetime probation. What would likely happen is some sort of therapy option -- a stay at a state mental hospital until she's better and then freedom.

(sarcasm = on)
Mental hospitals are great! They can take a 1st degree capital murderess like Mary Winkler and totally turn her around in only 67 days -- fully reforming her.
(sarcasm = off)

Like0 Dislike0

When a man gets arrested for child pedophilia it is viewed as a moral failure on the his part. In other words he had the reasoning ability to reject pedophilia but chose not to and is dealt with on that rationale.

But when women get arrested and sentenced for child pedophilia they are viewed as victims of a mental disease that caused an aberration of their true law abiding nature and are "treated" accordingly for the most part.

Child pedophilia is reprehensible but I do believe it is a severe mental disease akin to insanity and should be viewed as such for the male perpetrators too.

One could say that society and the law have it half right but could be better served by treating the disease rather than the symptoms in both genders.

The medical community not too long ago recommended vein opening (bleeding) as a sure cure for many common illnesses and the basic act of the attending physician washing his hands was considered unnecessary. The methods and attitudes about treating illness by medical science has obviously changed for the better and it is time for social/criminal science to become enlightened too. And it probably would be that way if misandry and gender politics where not so ingrained in the social viewpoints of society.

Like0 Dislike0

recent research has shown that criminal behaviour is basically "in the genes". (So much for the "standard social science model"). But that doesn't mean there is no free will involved, at least not on a philosophical level.

But it's cause is to be differentiated from mental illnesses,such as schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, depression, manic-depression, etc. "Insanity" is a legal term, not a medical one. (The term "psychosis" has no relation to the term "psychopath"). Although it may be true that some child molestors are mentally ill, but that still would not generally be the cause of the behaviour as such (though maybe the illness could affect judgement or inhibition).

Just to confuse the issue, "mental disease" is, I think, a term sometimes used to refer to an organic brain disorder, which can in turn cause schizophrenia (the latest theory on schizophrenia as a disorder, is that it has more than one possible source*), or be the source of dementia or other problems.

*One doctor has been maintaining, for years, that schizophrenia is in fact a "disease" due to a virus transmitted by cats. (So get rid of Felix before it's too late!)

-ax

Like0 Dislike0

It is interesting to note that the judge was a woman. I wonder as well the ratio of women jurors to men. The amount of sentencing was a personal statement by the judge. Following most cases, not religiously it seems that women are excused more often than men, and they get much lighter sentences. An inequality of justice regardless of the excuses. The punishment should be the same regardless of gender when it comes to rules. The spirit of the law has been stolen, the letter of the law has been misread, and the existing administration of the law is criminal.

David A. DeLong

Like0 Dislike0

Maybe she is a victim of "Neighbor's daughter was looked at funny by the trash man" syndrome, so she had to take the therapeutic (for herself) measure of getting revenge on the male sex as a class, thus the harsh sentence.

-ax

Like0 Dislike0

My point in submitting this article was that judges like this are allowed to, and even encouraged, to give these types of dramatical sentences. In my opinion, she rubs it in further by tacking the extra 1/2 year sentence to the end. If this was on CNN or Fox, I bet commentators relished that this "monster" should be put away for even longer. When in this country did we start saying that 10, 15 or 20 years in prison "isn't long enough"? Perhaps it isn't long enough for a serial murder, spree killer, or somone who robbed a bank for the 6th time. Isn't part of our criminal justice system suppose to be rehabilitation? If this guy is sentence to 20 years, is he going to abuse again when he is 75? Does he have a past record of abuse? Or, is the judge just mad that he didn't take the plea deal offered by the prosecution, or, for some other reason. The politicians and media have successfully politicized sentencing, so I guess that's why states have to ship their prisoners to other states when they run out of room as a result of these polticially correct sentencing guidelines.

Like0 Dislike0