The Legality Of A Women-Only Club In The #MeToo Era
Article here. Excerpt:
'Here’s a question I can’t get out of my mind: What does Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who created this country’s legal framework for gender equality by bringing a series of lawsuits arguing the law discriminated against men, think of The Wing?
...
The Wing also seems to be flouting standard public accommodations laws. As a company with more than 100 members, it is most likely in violation of New York Civil Rights Law § 40-C, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex “by any firm, corporation or institution.” The New York City Human Rights Commission opened an investigation into the company back in March. There are also laws against sex discrimination in California, where The Wing already has two locations, as well as Washington, Illinois, and Massachusetts, where The Wing will open locations by 2019. (Which is to say nothing of the question of what is the definition of a woman anyway.)
It is, by most accounts, a great place to both hang out and to work. According to Vogue, “[e]verything inside is designed to buoy one’s mood: The library (all books by or about women) is arranged into a rainbow by spine color, the plants are always green (they’re plastic), the Spotify playlists are peppy and familiar, and the language of the place is injected with moxie.” It has a packed roster of celebrity speakers — both Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez AND Hillary Clinton — a long waitlist for membership, and $42 million in venture funding.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
She talks as if younger women...
... view being in the presence of men an inherently harassing situation. I.e., just having men around = harassment. So they NEED a woman-only space to be free of the very menace of maleness.
If you think of men as lions and women as gazelles, then I kind of get it. A lion merely looking at a gazelle naturally gets the gazelle a bit nervous. The gazelle just might go to Jungle Court and ask the judge (I imagine the judge to be some kind of wise but kind of neutral being... maybe a koala bear) to let the gazelles have a gazelle-only field somewhere that lions aren't allowed to roam into. Makes sense.
That is... IF you view men as lions, i.e. carnivorous, powerful beasts who are designed to be predatory, and women as gazelles (herbivorous mild creatures inclined to run from predators and very limited in defense vs. lions except for their running ability). I for one don't.