The Line Between Professor and Predator Isn’t Always So Clear

Article here. Excerpt:

'Before I completed my degree, he recommended me for a coveted position at The New Yorker, which I took, finishing my thesis by night. I told myself I’d landed the full-time gig because I’d aced their editorial test and hit it off with my fascinating female boss, who’d been there since World War II. But without my professor’s referral, I may have landed next to my classmate as an assistant at Soap Opera Digest.
...
Wounded by my cold response, he took off, refusing to return my calls. He was mortified. While I’d put the brakes on a serious commitment, I hadn’t meant to end everything. I was confused. If he saw me in our shared neighborhood, he’d rush to cross the street. I felt guilty and grief-stricken. Yet completely ghosting me — not even returning a phone call — seemed cruel. Wasn’t he supposed to be the mature one? I’d never felt more alone or vulnerable. Breakups were bad enough, but I was afraid this split would exile me from my newfound colleagues and the literati crowd.
...
Now, after two decades in a happy union, I’ve learned I can be a feminist who loves men and marriage. This involves not lumping all men into the enemy camp, or labeling someone “sexist” or “predatory” just because they express desire.

In retrospect, my professor was not a Svengali seducing an innocent rube — or a skirt chaser abusing his position, like other infamous men in the news. I was never victimized. He was a gentleman who’d postponed our romance until I was no longer in his class. I’d been a consenting adult who’d actually initiated the relationship. I’d wanted him, went for him, got him — and his connections. When he’d pushed for more, I set the limits I needed to, and not all that gently. Then I published a book telling my side of the story.

Ultimately, he might have been more of a victim than I was.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Almost a month old but an educational read.  Clearly the author set about using her prof and succeeded.  She tries to poo-poo it but that's exactly what it was.  She still wants to see herself as somewhat the victim too of course, as she is a feminist.  But with age cometh some wisdom and at least enough for her to admit, albeit only partially, that her actions were entirely self-serving.  I've said it before, I'll say it again: Any man be he faculty, staff, and in some places, fellow student, h@ving *anything* to do with a collegiate female that isn't only the most required interaction based on their formal relationship terms is NUTS.  He is placing his job and reputation at risk.  Avoid contact with college women and decline any advances for non-essential contact no matter how ordinary or harmless you think they are.  And for God's sake, *date* one of them?  Are you nuts?  Avoid looking at much less talking to them if you're smart.  You really don't need feminists in your life.  And you can't always tell which are and are not, so you're well-advised to play it safe.  Better yet, why the hell work at a college these days anyway?  It's too nutty an environment.  You wouldn't catch me dead applying to a university job these days.  Perhaps that's what the campus feminists are hoping for.  Congrats, I say to them: you've succeeded at making sure another man *never* goes into a classroom as a teacher.  (Besides, teaching is sort of dull and kids today are idiots, so why do it even if whacky feminists weren't infesting higher ed?  The pay also sucks. :) )

Like0 Dislike0