A Challenge to Clinton: Show More Than Your ‘Woman Card’

Submitted by Mastodon on Sat, 2016-05-14 11:48

Article here. Excerpt:

'So here’s my challenge to Hillary Clinton: Give one speech; one, single speech without mentioning you’re a woman, or that you’re running to be the first female president. This challenge also forbids taking a non-women’s issue, like criminal justice reform, and turning it into a women’s issue because that’s really the only thing you know how to do.
...
Mr. Trump also pointed out something that shows some of the privilege women in America have. He said men are now “petrified” to speak to women. This is becoming increasingly true, as the “woman’s card” gives one the right to call anyone a sexist for saying anything they find objectionable.

Men are becoming afraid to open doors for women for fear of being called a sexist, male employers are afraid to close the door when speaking to female employees for fear of being accused of harassment, and god forbid a man say “good morning” to a woman on the street…

The problem is especially bad on college campuses, where normal human interaction is being redefined as sexual assault or harassment just because a woman decides later she didn’t like it. That’s the kind of fear and frustration Mr. Trump is channeling when he talks about men being “petrified” to speak to women.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Ugh.

http://theamericanmirror.com/sally-miller-hillary-and-her-coke-habit/

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Sun, 2016-05-15 21:07

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/holes-seen-in-clinton-foundation-records/article/2591335

'After more than a year of research, a Wall Street analyst is arguing the Clinton Foundation's books are riddled with financial inconsistencies that rise to the level of "fraud."

Charles Ortel, who gained recognition for correctly identifying problems with General Electric's financial statements in 2008, has prepared 40 reports highlighting discrepancies that he said proves the Clinton Foundation has covered up cash flow since 1997.

The financial whistleblower said his 15 months of research revealed gaps in the amount of money donors claim to have given and the amount of money the foundation claims to have received.'

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Mon, 2016-05-16 02:04

i thought we had already tapped the most corrupt admin. in history w/ our present misfit and his cabal of centralized conspirators. it looks to me that most government officials quickly get absorbed into the ranks of the plutocrats, whatever their present handle. a thief is a thief is a thief by any other name, except these thieves are multi disciplined in their nonchalant and nefarious necrology.

who do you want taking that phone call at 3 am?

guess we already know who we don't want.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by daveinga on Mon, 2016-05-16 15:06