Judge dismisses man’s claim of Title IX violation

Submitted by Mastodon on Thu, 2015-07-16 22:51

Article here. Excerpt:

'That summer, the student filed a complaint with USF against his ex-girlfriend. It was a complaint similar to the one she filed against him, claiming she violated the school’s code of conduct.

University officials did not investigate his complaint because it mirrored the one filed by his ex girlfriend, the suit says.

John Doe argued that his complaint should have be treated the same as hers.

Says his lawsuit: “Male students at USF, such as John Doe, are discriminated against solely on the basis of sex and are invariably found guilty, regardless of the evidence, or lack thereof.”'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Wait...
If their reason for not investigating "John Doe's" complaint was because it mirrored his ex-girlfriend's then did they investigate HER'S even though it mirrored HIS...?
If the excuse is "mirrored complaints", than logically BOTH complaints should be ignored...!
...However..., I'm guessing HER'S is NOT being ignored.
Do I have it right?

...my head hurts, now...

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by ErikaLancastor on Sat, 2015-07-18 00:46