Check Your ‘Privilege Theory’
Article here. Excerpt:
'Since 1979, the report says, the number of women going to college has accelerated relative to male enrollments. By 2012, there were 2.8 million more women than men in college, and by 2020 this “enrollment gap” is projected to grow to 4.4 million as women account for 74 percent of enrollment growth.
In 2000, the adult populations of college-educated men and women were approximately equal. By 2013, there were 4.9 million more women 25 or older with college degrees than men in that age group. This means a shortage of suitable male partners for a growing cohort of young women, who are postponing family formation. The report says millions of female-led households are being established by women who, being focused on their careers, are delaying motherhood, partly because of a shortage of suitable partners. More about suitability anon.
...
... Susan Patton, a Princeton graduate ... in a letter to the Daily Princetonian, she told “the young women of Princeton” what “you really need to know that nobody is telling you.” Which is that their future happiness will be “inextricably linked” to the men they marry, so they should “find a husband on campus” because “you will never again have this concentration of men who are worthy of you.” She explains:
"Men regularly marry women who are younger, less intelligent, less educated. It’s amazing how forgiving men can be about a woman’s lack of erudition, if she is exceptionally pretty. Smart women can’t (shouldn’t) marry men who aren’t at least their intellectual equal. As Princeton women, we have almost priced ourselves out of the market. Simply put, there is a very limited population of men who are as smart or smarter than we are . . . It will frustrate you to be with a man who just isn’t as smart as you."'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
The last thing I want to do...
... is have a mate who isn't as schmart as I am.
Imagine all the repeated explaining (MANSPLAINING) of things one would have to do, much less h@ving to define every 5th word you use since her vocabulary isn't up to yours. Marrying "dumb-down" as I have coined it just now is not anything I have ever seen a man want to do either by his words or deeds. If anything, a woman smarter than me *and* very career-oriented is just what I'd want should I be on the lookout for someone to marry or have an LTR with. After all, if we were to have a kid or she wanted a "trad'l arrangement", who would get shafted when/if she decides to go running off with her personal trainer? No, Ms. Patton had it wrong there.
Men do not necessarily seek to marry "dumb-down" nor "looks-up", at least not in my experience. On the contrary, it seems men are likely to marry/get into LTRs with women who are of the same physical comeliness as them and they at least hope to find one they think is in the same IQ range as them, anyway. After all, living w/ someone "dumber" (I hate the word "dumb", but it is the dictionary opposite for "smart", so whatever) is a burden. Smarter is better than dumber, though you do have to be on your toes. After all if she (or he -- any mate to anyone, really) is too much smarter than you, it may be that they can think 10 steps ahead of you and so be able to influence you in ways you otherwise would not like and you don't even know it's happening.
Guess this is how my 5th ex-wife, the brain surgeon, managed to talk me into giving her all my money to buy that crocodile farm in Florida and then money, *poof*, off with my money and her personal trainer to somewhere in S. America. Haven't even gotten a postcard from them. Insult to injury. =)