Analysis of Hillary Clinton's staff salaries proves embarrassing -- for her

Article here. Excerpt:

'Hillary Clinton portrays herself as a champion of women in the workforce, but women working for her in the U.S. Senate were paid 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis of her Senate years’ salary data.

During those years, the median annual salary for a woman working in Clinton’s office was $15,708.38 less than the median salary for a man, according to the analysis of data compiled from official Senate expenditure reports.
...
Mark Perry, an economic scholar at the American Enterprise Institute who has written extensively on the White House hypocrisy related to gender pay equality, said that the data on Clinton shows that she is guilty of the same hypocrisy.

“Politicians like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama can’t have it both ways,” Perry said. “They use raw, aggregate, unadjusted gender differences in pay and then claim that those pay gaps are the result of gender discrimination, like the 23 percent national gender pay gap in aggregate median income.”

“They would then have to admit that they themselves are guilty of gender discrimination and have their own glass ceilings to explain, because they have gender pay gaps that are much greater than the average gender pay gap in Washington, D.C.”

Perry said Clinton needs to either put an end to her rhetoric on the issue or admit that she too is guilty of gender discrimination.

“Either Clinton is guilty of gender discrimination and pays her female staffers significantly less than men, or she is guilty of statistical fraud for spreading misinformation about the alleged gender pay gap at the national level,” he said.

Signs indicate there will also be large gender pay gap on Clinton’s 2016 campaign staff. The Washington Post reported last week that Clinton will rely on “President Obama’s heavily male campaign apparatus” to run her upcoming presidential campaign.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Because "... and then, there are statisticians." The HB pays ppl what they'll take and only more if they know or think they're worth more *and* are perceived to be more likely to bring greater value than were initially offered. Add to that factors like willingness to put in long hours, etc., and the whole wage gap myth disappears in a puff.

The HB is no different from any other employer: she pays the least she can an seeks to get as much as she can from her employees. Well, who doesn't? It's just she can at least be honest about it, but oh, yeah, I done forgot: she's both a feminist *and* a politician. Honesty will not be forthcoming unless it suits her aims.

Like0 Dislike0